COM 0233.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REPLOGLE: Yes. RAFFIPIY: May I ask Mr. Au if he would agree to further in addition to what the revision of deleting that Condition J to re-label the subsequent conditions so that all the conditions will be labeled in sequential order. So, if we delete Condition J, K will become J, L and so and so forth? AU: Yes. So, I'd like to make— REPLOGLE: Okay. AU: —add that to my motion. RAFFIPIY: Thank you Mr. Au. REPLOGLE: Thank you both. KERN: Raising his hand. Mr. Chair? REPLOGLE: Yes. KERN: I just wanted to say potentially give the applicant an-opp_ortunity to respond to any other conditions that he may want_to discuss. I'm-not sureif there are REPLOGLE: Of course,thank you; Mr. Yamanaka's =_ G. YAMANAKA: You know I appreciate this ability to talk about it. I think for us it was just more some ofit,were-the word proposed- o I_wasn't sure if would we be considered existing, or the rezoning is considered as a proposed project? So, that I think was just a little,just a little uncertaintyon our end whether we'll_be considered`existing, or this is basically a new project or proposed_voject as defined n,some of the terms. , REPLOGLE Director Kern I think that's;for you? JACKSON: Raisingand. _=_= ZERN: Maija do you want to answer? JACKSON: Yeah, if you don't mind so I see the word proposed in Condition B, the very last sentence this is related to the water commitments. So, our intention and correct me if I'm wrong Director Kern was that this condition to have appropriate water meters and valid water commitments would apply to the existing property and upon consolidation and re-subdivision this condition would need to be met by creating a water meter for each new lot. So, if language is needed to clarify that we could change the word proposed to existing use in the last sentence. I'm just looking through the other conditions. 15 EXHIBIT B (DRAFT)