COM 0233.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

G. YAMANAKA: There's I believe H; L has the word proposed. JACKSON: So, Condition H is kind of the same thing, the Sewer Code already says that if there is an existing line fronting a property you are required to connect, that's a requirement in the Sewer Code even if this condition were not in here. So, if the existing development is not currently connected to the sewer you would need to meet Department of Environmental Management (DEM)requirements for that connection. Then Condition L is just the catch all that you need to comply with any rules, regulations, and laws and that applies to the existing development as well as any proposed future use. KERN: We are open to feedback on that because somethingAthat we don't want to do, and we only have so much latitude that we can have we certainly dot want to set up conditions that are impossible. You know what I mean we don't want to set conditions that are achievable and in alignment and again on the sewer side its quite challenging becaus=e=we don't have the authority over that so basically a condition that goes in there-that's, already in that code. But perhaps there is a way to find some latitude I'm not sure. Garth,_what's your feelingsaround that? G. YAMANAKA: No, I appreciate that, and I think_a lot of this is straight forward, the water meters is something that we've done the water calculations fog=the Water Department and we're okay with that it makes sense to have the additional meters_= o, yes everything looks good. KERN: Thank you. -- _ REPLOGLE: Okay, vias there anything further? CLARKSON: Raised--hand. REPLOGLE- So,w__e are, yes Mr Clarkson? CLARKSON: I hate to do this,but IT just want-to ask Counsel Hall, this is just a niggling thing as to the for= at of the motion as the Director used his prerogative as he always says to change his recommendations and removed and renumbered remove Condition J and renumbered them such that we dol'_t have to make,motion=including that or has he not? HALL: My understanding is that Director Kern has removed J. I do not know that he also said that he was renumbering or re let ering I should say. I don't think there is any problem with being redundant but for technicalities sake if you guys want the motion amended to just say your adopting the Planning Director's recommendation with also re-lettering because of his recommendation you can do that as well but as it stands, I don't see a problem with the motion. REPLOGLE: Thank you. Are you good, Mr. Clarkson? CLARKSON: Good to go. REPLOGLE: Okay, Mr. Au would you be able to repeat your motion? 16 EXHIBIT B (DRAFT)