Laserfiche WebLink
Bank of Hilo was seized by the bank and in nineteen eleven (1911)was sold to the Honolulu Iron <br /> Works. <br /> In nineteen twelve(1912), reconstruction of the cannery began. In nineteen(1913)the foundry <br /> began operation, and the new Hilo Iron Works was in full operation. It would be known as the <br /> Hilo Iron Works for the next seventy(70)plus years. The foundry was used to cast things such <br /> as sugar mill components and specialty equipment but declining demand for these castings and <br /> growing demand for steel fabrication led to the closing of the foundry in nineteen fifty-eight <br /> (1958). In a joint operation by Theo H. Davies and C. Brewer sugar plantations the Hilo Iron <br /> Works was purchased from Ward Foods Inc. in nineteen seventy-four(1974) in order that it <br /> would not close, ensuring the fabrication of the needed components and equipment. During <br /> nineteen eighty-two (1982) the sugar plantations on the islandof Hawai`i suffered large loses <br /> and business fell off at the Iron Works. In nineteen eighth three(1983) the Hilo Iron Works <br /> went out of business. <br /> The current owners purchased the property inthe early nineteen eighties (1980's). <br /> We are requesting a Change of Zone from Open tovindustrial C_ommercial Mixed Use—20,000 <br /> square feet (MCX-20) for the 3.29 acres of land. This in order to accommodate.the minimum <br /> lot sizes that we have agreed to consolidate and re-subdivideihese 7 parcels into-4 separate <br /> parcels. Part of the reason I talked about thel istory of the site was to give you an idea of what <br /> was going on prior to the tsunami that hitNHilo-in nineteen forty-six (1946) and nineteen sixty <br /> (1960). <br /> After the 1960 tsunami hit Hilo, the_Iron Works_property fel-=under the Hawai`i Redevelopment <br /> Agency and the Amended Renewal Plan ofnineteen sixty-five (1965). The Hilo Iron <br /> 'Works property fell into the.boundaries defined-a-§77?. Open Areas"which were the low elevation <br /> areas in closerproximity to the ocean The_Hilo Iron Works property was permitted to have <br /> "Limited_Tndustrial"use within theOpen`area -All uses were intended as interim uses for a term <br /> of thirty five (35) years, or until such time that°adequate control measures could be implemented <br /> to mitigate the effects of future tsunamis. The 35 years term has expired and so the permitted <br /> uses has reverted back to uses allowed-within the Open zoning district. <br /> This has created avery unique situation for the Hilo Iron Works site. The site which has a <br /> majority of its improvements stillintact, that has survived two (2) tsunami's and has a history of <br /> mixed industrial and commercial eo-nimerciaT±tse has had a zoning applied to it which has taken away from <br /> its highest and best use. T bring up the highest and best use as it is crucial to the valuation of the <br /> property. Opinions of value-are based on use. The highest and best use of a property provides <br /> the foundation for a thorough investigation of the competitive position of the property in the <br /> minds of market participants. It can be best described as the foundation on which market value <br /> rests. <br /> One of the four tests of highest and best uses is whether it is legally permissible. Due to the open <br /> zoning, the current uses on the Hilo Iron Works site is non-conforming. The non-conforming <br /> use has created the following issues. The non-conforming use needs to be approved by the <br /> Planning Director. This discretion creates uncertainty as the Planning Director is in an appointed <br /> 4 <br /> EXHIBIT B (DRAFT). <br />