COM 0332.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

t s(I V f 3 3 Works on their intent to install a full width concrete sidewalk from the base of the existing wall to the edge of the existing sidewalk. The Planning Director felt that amending Condition G by adding the section"or as wide as the present property line and paved right-of-way will allow" was necessary for this amendment to address the concerns by the applicant that they did not want to really touch that rock wall As well as (clearing of throat, excuse me) as well as the previous discussed proposed amendment to the sidewalk Condition G, the Planning Director also proposed an amendment to Condition B and G in regards to the change in tenancy timing trigger that was placed in the Director's original recommendation report. The Director recommends the removal of the change in tenancy timing triggers in both Conditions B and G. In Condition B, the Director is proposing to amend the condition and replace the change in tenancy with an"addition to an existing structure or development"thus making the timing triggers for both Condition B and G to remain either when the establishment of a new permitted land use in the CG district occurs or if any addition to an existing structure or development occurs which would be more consistent with our Chapter 25 Section twenty-five dash two dash seventy one (25-2-71) of our Zoning Code in relation to the Plan Approval. As well as the recommended changes to Conditions B and G the Director is also proposing to amend Condition O to correct the typographical error. The error incorrectly mentioned Condition K as the exception to the allowance for an initial time, extension of time for performance conditions when it should have been Condition J which relates to the applicant's sewer connectivity which we are required to follow Chapter twenty-one dash five (21-5) of the Hawaii County Code and their timing requirement for sewerconnectivity. That does conclude my presentation, the Planning Director is recommending that the Planning Commission forward a'favorable recommendation to the County Council for the Change of Zone application number 21-245 along with the June second (2nd) twenty twenty-twenty one (2021) revisions to Conditions B, G,and O and that concludes my presentation and I'd be happy to answer any questions that the Commissioners may have. REPLOGLE: Thank you Tracie. Are there any questions from my fellow Commissioners? Yes, Mr. Clarkson? CLARKSON: Yes, I have a question, has there's construction within that County right-of-way on Lono Street the driveway, parking, there's even a shed encroaching it looks like onto the right-of-way. Condition H requires that construction within the County right-of-way shall comply with Hawaii County,Code, Chapter twenty-two (22), County Streets. Has it been determined that all of these improvements are already in compliance with that chapter of the code? CAMERO: So, the department had checked with the Department of Public Works (DPW) in regards to Lono Street and originally, we thought that possibly they would have a comment or possibly imply conditions for Lona Street improvements. However, at this time the Department of Public Works didn't have any comments to require the applicant to do improvements on Lono Street. The only conditions that they were, the only types of comments they had was for them to improve the Kino`ole Street frontage at this time. 4 EXHIBIT B(DRAFT)