Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: Okay and there's since they didn't comment obviously there is no intention to do <br /> a Lono Street extension. I'm just concerned a little bit that all of the access, the current access to <br /> the property and parking is all predicated on the County never doing anything with Lono Street <br /> and it doesn't look like there's been any provision for any other access to the property for some <br /> time in the future should the County decide to improve Lono Street. <br /> JACKSON: I can try to answer that question Chair, Commissioner Clarkson. So, the <br /> Department of Public Works does not allow any encroachments within their right-of-way. So, if <br /> there is any concrete structures they would have to, the applicant would need to remove that if <br /> it's within the County's right-of-way and so that is covered under the County Streets Code is my <br /> understanding or they would have to get some kind of encroachment agreement from the <br /> Department of Public Works to keep any encroaching structures within the right-of-way. The <br /> Department of Public Works did not have any requirements for this rezone for having the <br /> applicant improve Lono Street. But, should some land use, commercial land use be established <br /> in the future that would require another access then either the Department of Public Works <br /> would then have to come in and pave Lono Street and then the applicant would need to connect <br /> to Lono Street as required by Chapter 22 the County Streets Code. Does that,answer your <br /> question? <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, it does in general although I'm a little bit concerned that the proposed map <br /> of the proposed use after rezone still shows all the unauthorized improvements on Lono Street. <br /> It doesn't show them being removed. I mean, in!a way it's fine with me as long as Public Works <br /> doesn't have any problem with it but, it is kind of unusual that all of this activity is taking place <br /> in a public right-of-way, and it is continuing to be proposed to take place. That's not a question a <br /> that's just a comment. <br /> i <br /> JACKSON: Yeah, maybe we can ask the applicant's what their plans are for the encroachments <br /> and what their intent on keeping the encroachments or removing them is. <br /> RAZNOV: Yes, may I speak to that please? Yes,hi. 3 <br /> REPLOGLE- I'm sorry who are you? <br /> RAZNOV: Hi, good morning yes,let me introduce myself Thank you. My name is Jill <br /> Raznov, I'm the representative and attorney for applicant's John and, John Wagner and Charlene <br /> Iboshi who are here with me today on the screen. And I thank you for this opportunity Chair <br /> Replogle and the entire— <br /> i <br /> REPLOGLE: Excuse me. <br /> AGUINALDO: She wasn't sworn in. <br /> REPLOGLE: We're still, we're still answering questions. <br /> RAZNOV: Yes, I understand. Thank you so much. <br /> 5 <br /> EXHIBIT B(DRAFT) <br />