Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> t <br /> i <br /> j <br /> t <br /> i <br /> k <br /> I <br /> Conditions 13 and C required completion of the project svithin five (5) years acrd <br /> suhnjittal ofa %nater calculation studV and pavnlent ofthe wafer commitment lee_ <br /> ssitljin 180 (1a\y, respectivc.IN,of the eftectivc d:jtc of the ordinance(NMarch 0_ <br /> 2()12). 'I-hese conditions were not Complied with, in spite ofthe initial live f 5l year I <br /> c,tcnsion to complete the project. <br /> C'onsidcrim the above., the :-'applicant--- Takata Dental health Center, Inc. - is <br /> requesting, time extensions of an additional 180 days to address the water related <br /> requirements and tine (5) years to complete the project with an opportunity fol, an <br /> administrative extension. In the event the administrative extension option is <br /> una vailable, the Applicant requests live (5)years to commence and ten (10)years to <br /> complete the project. <br /> IV. JUS4 It ICA HON (_W R'LQCV <br /> Condition 1' ofthe rezoning ordinance (Ord, 12 3:3) outlined three (3) criteria <br /> whereby a time extension may be considered. (hese criteria and their justification <br /> For both extension requests follow. <br /> Yy. Thc, fit) a-per101-rr once is the result o crn ditio"S that could nol have be cn <br /> trrrc.sc'cta or are bervond the control of lhc, aplViccrrrt, sUCCeSsarS of, rrarcl <br /> thc.rt circ rrert the rersuft erftherir fiim1t or negligence. <br /> 'file subject site was the family home ofthe applicant. Conain- ftom a tanj ly <br /> ofdental practitioners, the Applicant had planned to relocate its practice to the <br /> subject site where parking and conjmunity accessibility would be greater. As <br /> such, it sought and received rezoning approval in 2012. <br /> Alotu;the way, conceptual plans were l alized, resetting in the receipt of <br /> Final flan Approval on NMay 29, 015, all %vithin the allotted construction <br /> timetable of the rezoning ordinance. Shortly thereafter, the: dwelling and <br /> related structures were demolished in accordance with a demolition permit <br /> issued on .luly 10, 2(115. <br /> Regrettably the health ofone ofthe principals--who was the driving torc: <br /> behind the project turned south and the pro_lect languished. The project was <br /> then pickcd up by the other principal. vkho was unable to provide the needed <br /> Zjttention to the project given the demanding schedule oflus dental practice. <br /> As such, an administrative time extension was granted on October 16, 2016 to <br /> March b. 2022. <br /> The project suffered another setback with the untimely passim of the project <br /> architect in December 2019. And the C'OVID-I q pandemic wreaked havoc on <br /> all plaus, 1~e& nirrg Jai'mary 202rJ. <br /> 6 <br />