Laserfiche WebLink
23. Traffic: According to the applicant, based on a review of the Institute of Traffic <br /> Engineers (ITE) trip generation manual, the proposed development, at full buildout, <br /> would only generate 42 peak hour trips(assuming 3,500 square feet of retail space, 4,000 <br /> square feet of medical clinic space and 6,000 square feet of general office space) which <br /> would not exceed the 50 peak hour trips which would trigger the requirement for a <br /> Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR). <br /> UTILITIES AND SERVICES <br /> 24. Access: Access to the property is proposed from Pahoa-Kapoho Road(Highway 132), <br /> which is a County-owned and maintained roadway with a pavement width of <br /> approximately 22 feet within a 60-foot-wide right-of-way and designated by the General <br /> Plan as a major collector road. The proposed driveway is situated as far from the <br /> intersection as possible to avoid traffic backing up onto Highway 130. There is a 6-foot- <br /> wide paved shoulder along the property boundary as well. No access point is proposed <br /> onto the Pahoa-Kalapana Road(Highway 130), which is a State owned, limited access <br /> highway. According to the Department of Public Works (DPW)-Engineering Division, <br /> any driveway connections and/or construction within the Pahoa-Kapoho Road Right-of- <br /> Way(ROW), would need to conform to Chapter 22, of the Hawai`i County Code and be <br /> approved by DPW. Based on the proposed commercial zoning, DPW recommends that <br /> the applicant provide improvements to the property's Pahoa-Kapoho Road frontage, <br /> including pavement widening and construction of concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, <br /> relocation of utilities, and other required improvements. Finally, DPW recommends that <br /> the applicant design, purchase and install streetlights and traffic control devices that may <br /> be required by the Traffic Division. <br /> In response, the applicant has requested relief from the requirement to provide curb, <br /> gutter, and sidewalk improvements citing incompatibility of these"urban type" <br /> infrastructure improvements with the rural character of the community and the lack of <br /> similar facilities in the immediate vicinity of the property. Instead, the applicant is <br /> proposing to construct or delineate a new, 8-foot wide,paved pedestrian path within the <br /> subject property that would be available to the public during normal business hours, but <br /> closed to the public after hours to discourage loitering. The applicant included an <br /> • <br /> -5- <br />