Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> KAY: Okay. Thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you. <br /> So— <br /> KAY: And just--sorry to interrupt one more time. Just so we're clear that Condition 5 is included <br /> in every, each of the new SMA Permits, so we'll apply that language accordingly. <br /> FUKE: Understood. <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioners, at this point, I think I think we've had a pretty lengthy discussion. <br /> I'd seek a motion on this,whether— <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Pardon me. <br /> VITOUSEK: Go ahead. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Sorry, Mr. Chairman. I just need to disclose that I serve, I just serve on a <br /> nonprofit board as a volunteer board member with Stanford Carr on the Trust for Public Land, so <br /> I just wants to disclose that. <br /> VITOUSEK: Well, I don't think there's any harm there.Not, not an applicant here or relation, <br /> but okay. Does that prevent you from being fair and objective in your-- <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: It does not prevent me from being. <br /> VITOUSEK: Anybody have any objections?No. Okay. Cool. <br /> Yeah, so going back to it, I think, you know, we can do a motion, or you know, to accept. So, <br /> procedurally what Planning Department wants, correct me if I'm wrong, is to repeal 25, replace it <br /> with the new SMAs, and then issue recommendations for the zoning to the County. <br /> KERN: Yup. You're on it. <br /> VITOUSEK: So, I think that the conditions that we've briefly discussed as being possible would <br /> be added on to the zoning as well as the SMA, but that would be as a recommendation to the <br /> County Council. <br /> JACKSON: So, Chair Vitousek, the way we could do this is, we could send up a letter to the <br /> County Council with your recommendation and in that letter list the three concerns that the <br /> Commission had that could be incorporated into the rezone conditions. One was related to <br /> affordable housing; the police, fire impact; and connectivity to the north. And then those would <br /> 48 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />