|
go up to Counsel, the Director and the applicant would work together to address those prior to it
<br /> getting to Council, and then for the four SMA permits, we would apply the public access
<br /> condition that was just worked on, and you could make a decision on that today, if you chose.
<br /> VITOUSEK: And then the other thing I've noticed in the SMA permits is there's no, there's no
<br /> timeframe for these. Is that correct? What's the purpose behind that?
<br /> KAY: Generally, SMA permits are dealing with resources within the SMA and your rezonings
<br /> is where you would normally have development timeframes. So, in this case under the, the
<br /> rezoning's the Director has indicated that he didn't want a development timeframe. Since this is
<br /> an established resort area, it's not likely the plans will change outside of developing these resort-
<br /> type uses, as are permitted. Thus, there would not be a development timeframe like other resort
<br /> project districts or things like that.
<br /> VITOUSEK: If there's no,there must be no time frames in the existing SMA. Is that correct?
<br /> KAY: There were timeframes, let me take a quick look here, let me open it up. I believe there
<br /> were timeframes related to timing of developing, developing plans and programs and the like,
<br /> but largely these were accessory permits to the rezoning that had development timeframes, so the
<br /> rezoning ordinances or the State Land Use decision and orders, the LUC decision and orders, so,
<br /> as I'm looking at the existing SMA 25 conditions, I don't see any development timeframes
<br /> articulated there. Except for there was a construction timeframe for the golf course. And that was
<br /> Condition 12,but that's being proposed to be deleted. But overall, there weren't development
<br /> time frames for the resort as such.
<br /> FUKE: If I might just add to that, this is kind of unusual is that for the SMA permit, while there
<br /> is no extension, you know, provision, there is a explicit condition that requires like an annual
<br /> report. We provide it to the Department and the Commission for each of the SMA, so that should
<br /> alert the Commission in terms of the progress of the project. And there is that follow up
<br /> condition that if the conditions are not being fulfilled, then the Director is obligated to initiate the
<br /> application process.
<br /> VITOUSEK: But, if there is no timeline by which they have to be fulfilled, then, what is there to
<br /> do because you can just say, "Oh yeah, we're going to get to that, we don't have any, we don't
<br /> have anything holding us to when we can do that, but we'll do it."Not that you guys would do
<br /> any of that, of course,but I always think that having on paper makes the best neighbors, so to
<br /> speak.
<br /> Commissioner Yates?
<br /> YATES: That was, that was just my concern that I was going to ask because previously, it was
<br /> like there's no specific date when the workforce housing will happen. And so, you all are going
<br /> to get going with the project,but the people who are going to be working the project might still
<br /> not have housing and since there's no date on that, I guess that's really my concern. Because to
<br /> me it's a big deal for, especially young people with families that do need to have a place to stay,
<br /> they do need to, you know,be with their families.
<br /> 49
<br /> EXHIBIT D
<br />
|