Laserfiche WebLink
on the State or National Registers of Historic Places. However, three (3) historic <br /> trails/trail segments in the vicinity of the project site are listed on the State Inventory of <br /> Historic Places (SIHP), including the Ala Loa: KTholo-Puako Trail (SIHP 50-10-10- <br /> 10308), Ala Loa Foot Trail (SIHP 50-10/11-11334), and Ala Loa(Kiholo-Puako Trail <br /> Segment) (SIHP 50-10-10-21173). Finally, the Ala Loa Trail is considered part of the Ala <br /> Kahakai National Historic Trail,which is listed on the Federal Register of Historic <br /> Places. <br /> 32. Cultural Resources: A Native Hawaiian Traditional and Customary Practices <br /> Assessment report was prepared by TCP Hawai`i, LLC (TCP), which was designed to <br /> identify valued cultural, historical, or natural resources in the project area and its general <br /> vicinity (see Appendix 5 of the application). Additionally, the report outlines the extent to <br /> which traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are practiced in the project area, <br /> the extent to which those resources would be affected or impaired by the proposed <br /> project, and feasible actions to be taken (if any)to protect native Hawaiian rights if they <br /> are found to exist. TCP conducted a records search and interviews of eight(8) "Key <br /> Informants" (including area cultural practitioners, members of local Hawaiian cultural <br /> groups, Hawaiian Homestead Associations and Civic Clubs, access trail experts and an <br /> archaeologist.) The report included the following: 1) given the distance from the <br /> shoreline, there would be no impacts to shoreline fishing and gathering; 2) there is a <br /> disagreement on the cultural, historical, and archaeological significance of the trails in the <br /> project area; 3)there is concern over as yet unidentified historic properties, including <br /> burials in the project area; 4)there is concern over the impact of the proposed project on <br /> subterranean freshwater aquifers in the project area, should they exist; and 5)the view <br /> plane of the general area will be adversely affected by the new project. Finally, the report <br /> made the following recommendations to address these concerns: 1) that the draft project <br /> AIS be submitted to SHPD for review and evaluation; 2)that SHPD,Na Ala Hele and <br /> Ala Kahakai be further consulted by Haun and Associates to reach an agreement on the <br /> significance and mitigation of impacts to trails in the project area; and 3)that the project <br /> area be assessed by persons with expertise in subterranean hydrogeology in order to <br /> address the issues of a presence or absence of subterranean freshwater aquifers that some <br /> consider to be valued cultural resources. <br /> -14- <br />