Laserfiche WebLink
particular standards that we are doing, we will pursue it. I don't know if Sidney wanted to add <br /> that. <br /> FUKE: The short answer is yes, Commissioner Lin. Having it ADA compliant and having the <br /> appropriate public access easement in running that to the applicant property; subject to County <br /> review and approval of the easement document is totally acceptable. <br /> II <br /> AU: Commissioner Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I just have another question for Ms. Matsumoto from DPW related to the <br /> utilities on the presumably on the County right-of-way and is there even room there was <br /> discussion earlier about having to move all the utility infrastructure in order to create curb, <br /> gutter, and sidewalk. Is there actually room between the utility poles and the paved for a <br /> standard curb, gutter sidewalk or, in your opinion, would the utilities have to be moved toward <br /> the property line to create that room? <br /> MATSUMOTO: I didn't see any drawing with any measurements. Our current standard is to <br /> have the back of the utility pole one foot away from the back of the property line. So, I'm not <br /> too sure if there's enough if it's already there. Kind of looked like it was based on some of those <br /> concrete bumpers. The minimum for ADA is 3 feet, so I mean it looks like it would be enough. <br /> It depends on the standard requirement, whether we would allow it to just meet the 36 or ask <br /> them to move it back to the 1 foot. It would actually have to deal with our discussion with <br /> HELCO regarding their infrastructure there because depending on the pole size and the amount <br /> of tension we may not want to move any of the poles until we can move the entire whole row. <br /> CLARKSON: Thank you. <br /> MATSUMOTO: Sorry. <br /> AU: Okay. <br /> MATSUMOTO: Chair, can I make one other statement? <br /> AU: Yes. <br /> MATSUMOTO: I forgot to mention. A lot of these are coming up where DPW is making the <br /> recommendation for curb, gutter, and sidewalk and I understand it's a huge cost to the applicant <br /> and not just with this one,but all the other ones that we've reviewed. And it's hard to envision <br /> to right. You want us to put a sidewalk in the middle of where there's no other sidewalks, so we <br /> understand that as well. In another Change of Zone, the planning I think, was approved, so that <br /> the owner would pay for the improvement at the time the County did come in and do the <br /> improvements throughout that whole block. So, I mean that is another option as well and it's <br /> something we feel that it's,,a reasonable for the Department of Public Works and for the <br /> applicant. It's just harder if the applicant sells it to somebody else and the County comes in 10 <br /> years later, now the new owner has to bear that burden of the cost and hopefully, they are aware <br /> of it at the time as well of purchase. That's it, thank you. <br /> 12 <br /> EXHIBIT C (DRAFT) <br />