Laserfiche WebLink
Lualai Estates. The community is actually is responsible for the maintenance of that shoulder <br /> area. So, that's why that there's that open swale with on walking path. It's not a standard for the <br /> County. We either recommend paved shoulders and swales or concrete curb gutter. If you do <br /> decide to go and allow them this alternate path within private property, we don't have any <br /> jurisdiction. We do recommend that the path be made out of something permanent like AC or <br /> concrete and if it's going to be used by the public, it should also meet the ADA requirements. <br /> We want to ensure that we don't have to bear the burden of maintenance or any liability, so we <br /> would want to see any of the easement documentation written up before it gets recorded. Do you <br /> have any questions for me? <br /> AU: Commissioner Clarkson does.have a question, please go ahead. <br /> CLARKSON: I'm just wondering what in reference to Commissioner Galimba's concerns about <br /> drainage. Are there dry wells or other road drainage structures near that intersection? <br /> MATSUMOTO: I don't believe there's any roadside dry wells. There may be a drywall in the <br /> private property as proposed in their development plan. <br /> CLARKSON: No, I'm not talking about within property but— <br /> MATSUMOTO: So, there's none on the shoulder area. <br /> CLARKSON: And no continuing drainage issues with that? <br /> MATSUMOTO: None that I'm aware of. <br /> CLARKSON: Okay, thank you. <br /> AU: Commissioner Lin, did you have a question? <br /> LIN: Yeah, it's really more for the applicant and the applicant's representatives. If you were to <br /> comply with Ms. Matsumoto's conditions of having an ADA and the easement document and all <br /> that. Is that something that you guys would be okay with or is that something that you are <br /> against? <br /> ARAI: Well, I think the request is, sorry. <br /> FUKE: Go ahead, go ahead Daryn. <br /> ARAI: Sorry. I love this cooperative thing,but sometimes it creates complications, so I don't <br /> want to talk over the Master so anyway. But anyway, I think it's totally reasonable, I mean that <br /> is the whole point on why it's been proposed and when you really think about it, this is a <br /> commercial property right, I mean, sorry. We're hoping it's a commercial property and along <br /> with commercial property you have basic requirements like, for example, accessible parking, <br /> accessible pathways into the stores. There are accessibility key requirements all over the place, <br /> and I think by offering this alternative it would be no different, we would have to meet those <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT C (DRAFT) <br />