My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2022 3:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/1/2022 3:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
596
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/02/08 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AU: Okay, thank you Mr. Fuke. So, I'm ready to entertain a motion? <br /> • <br /> LIN: Chair, I'd like to make a motion. <br /> AU: Go ahead Commissioner Lin. <br /> LIN: I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the <br /> application for a Change of Zone, Docket No. REZ 2021-008, based on the Planning Director's <br /> recommendation. But I'd like to make I guess a couple of changes to the conditions based off of <br /> our discussion today. I don't know what the language would be but, can it be subject to <br /> whatever DPW, and the Planning Department comes up with. <br /> AU: Mr. Kay, you can go ahead and help him with the motion,please. <br /> LIN: Yes. <br /> KAY: Sure if it's appropriate right now. The department had a few thoughts of proposed <br /> changes if we saw that the Commission was going to be amenable to a change of that condition. <br /> So, if I can share it on the screenq uickl . <br /> y <br /> AU: Yes. <br /> KAY: Give me one moment please. <br /> AU: So, we currently have the motion on the floor from Commissioner Lin to approve the <br /> rezone with amendments to Condition K, and that is stated on and after this we will need a <br /> second. <br /> KAY: Sure. Do you want to get the second first before we start? <br /> AU: No, I think we should state the motion first and if it gets seconded. <br /> KAY: Okay if this is acceptable to the Commission and to the applicant. It's basically an <br /> amendment to add an ADA compliant foregoing minimum 8-foot-wide all-weather dust free. <br /> We wanted to clarify paved instead of all-weather dust free that's what's proposed on the site <br /> plan. So, all the proposed changes that we have are in red. After public access easement <br /> meeting with the approval of the Planning Director in consultation with the Department of Public <br /> Works which should address the other question or the other thing that was brought up. So, I'm <br /> open to any thoughts on this language from the Commission or the applicant if this is acceptable. <br /> AU: Commissioner Lin or the applicant or Ms. Matsumoto any comments regarding this <br /> language? <br /> LIN: I defer to the applicant if they are okay with the language. <br /> 14 <br /> EXHIBIT C (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.