COM 0596.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ARAI: Christian, I'm sorry for whatever reason I'm not able to see the entire condition on the screen. It's truncating at the very bottom. KAY: Oh shoot, so the only changes that we're proposing Daryn are the ones in red. ARAI: Okay. KAY: Everything else came from your proposed condition change. So, talking about the easement for being allow unrestricted public access until such time as the construction of sidewalk improvements and so on. So, our proposed changes to your proposed changes are in red. ARAI: Okay. KAY: Yeah. ARAI: I don't have any problems with the proposed amended language. FUKE: Yeah, we're like the Tweedle-dee and Tweedledum of the applicant for this so, yeah, I agree with what Daryn is saying. I think that it clarifies and addresses the point about the ADA compliant and it actually goes without saying that whatever we submitted will still be subject to the approval of Planning and Public Works. So having that statement in is totally acceptable itself. My recommendation would be to go along with theproposed amendment as recommended by the staff. KAY: Commissioner Clarkson has his hand raised. AU: Go ahead Commissioner Clarkson, I don't see you, sorry. CLARKSON: Yes, I just wanted to make one suggestion if it's appropriate at this time, considering that we're amending the qualifying Commissioner Lin's motion. Based on ADA compliance standards that.were relayed by Ms. Matsumoto, I think we need to retain the 8-foot width rather than allow dropping back to a 3-foot width. This will be I think more traveled than a 3-foot width would talk accommodate. So, I'm fine with the paved, but I think we should retain the 8-foot width. KAY: So, Commissioner Clarkson what I hear you saying if we changed it back to ADA compliant, minimum 8-foot-wide paved pedestrian path so on and so forth. CLARKSON: That would be my suggestion. FUKE: And the applicant would have no objection to that because that was the original representation to begin with. AU: Okay, thank you. Ms. Matsumoto any comment? Okay, well, so that is the motion on the floor. That is the amendment to Condition K. So, could I get a second? 15 EXHIBIT C (DRAFT)