My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2022 3:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/1/2022 3:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
596
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/02/08 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DARROW: I understand your question. Given the unique circumstances of this particular <br /> application and the location of this particular property almost being separated from the Village <br /> Core and connected to as the applicant represented it noted a more rural designated area. I think <br /> given the unique circumstances, I think the adjustment is and as well agreed to by DPW that it is <br /> acceptable. Ultimately, it'll be the Council's decision whether or not they feel this is <br /> appropriate,but I think we've all agreed that moving forward in this particular where we're at <br /> now with this proposal. It's acceptable,but I just again wanted to bring to light that we've seen <br /> it in the past, things change. We've had people come back in and do those traffic analysis <br /> reports and requirements being placed on them that were more significant. That required the <br /> curb, gutters, sidewalk construction with the increase in uses. So, the reason why I'm saying it is <br /> because we have it as a condition. Right now, that they can do these improvements,but in the <br /> future, they may be required to do other types of improvements. Just wanted to bring that up so <br /> everyone's clear on it, thank you. <br /> GALIMBA: Thank you. <br /> AU: Thank you Commissioner Galimba for the question. If we have no more discussion, we <br /> can call for the vote. <br /> KAY: Yes, thank you, Mr. Chair. So, this is a motion for a favorable recommendation with <br /> amendments to Condition K. Commissioner Lin? <br /> LIN: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Galimba? <br /> GALIMBA: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Raffipiy? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Replogle? <br /> REPLOGLE: Aye. <br /> KAY: And Chair Au? <br /> AU: Aye. <br /> KAY: Thank you, Mr. Chair motion carries six (6) nothing. <br /> 17 <br /> EXHIBIT C (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.