COM 0596.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CLARKSON: Second. AU: Commissioner Clarkson has seconded, so now we can go into discussion. I'll go ahead and go first. I support this motion; I think it's fair for all parties with all the issues that we discussed and that's my comments. Any other Commissioners? Oh, sorry staff, Mr. Darrow you got a concern? DARROW: If there's no other issues or questions from the Commission, I wanted to just make a comment. AU: Okay. Maybe we do to questions or any more discussions or you know what Mr. Darrow just go ahead and make your comment. DARROW: Okay, thank you. As mentioned by the applicant and the representatives, this is a unique situation, and the Commission has made a recommendation to make that adjustment in this particular situation. I just want to bring to mind to the Commission that this is a change from residential to commercial and again, it is a unique situation. Condition L, I want to bring that to light that right now what's being proposed it's not triggering a traffic impact analysis report it's just under it. In the future, as we've got to keep in mind that there are proposals, conceptual plans that are brought before the Commission and the Council, those are subject to change right. I mean and I'm not saying that this is the case in any manner, in this case,but we have to keep in mind that this will become a commercial property. It could become a McDonald's, it could become a gas station, it could become any number of uses that are allowed in that particular commercial zone. Condition L is our kind of like safety net if those proposals come into us, we'll ask for them if the uses reach to a level that it's going to require a traffic impact analysis report. The applicant or new owner, whoever will need to do a new traffic assessment or analysis report and will have to comply with recommendations made in that report. So that's where I want to just make put it on the record that, even though there's a condition now these improvements for this particular proposed project the possibility in the future of that use changing and the requirements to put in other types of improvements may change. So, I just want to acknowledge that moving forward. Thank you. AU: Thank you, Mr. Darrow. Any discussions fellow Commissioners? Okay, if not, Mr. Kay, oh sorry, Commissioner Galimba. GALIMBA: Yes, sorry, I guess, I just wanted to ask, this question is for Mr. Darrow based on your comments there. I guess, I just wanted to follow on and not sort of looking forward. Are we making sort of exceptions that could be problematic in the future with this. I guess especially Condition K. Since that's what's under consideration I'm assuming all the other conditions are sort of standard and forward looking. So, are we in your opinion, could there be problems from having made this kind of exception or maybe exception is even too strong of a word concession? 16 EXHIBIT C (DRAFT)