COM 0945.000 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

and proximity to urban areas. As such, the commitment of natural or other resources (such as botanical and avifauna() would not appear to be significant_ Based on a SHPD-approved AIS, there are no archaeological or cultural features on the site that are being recommended for preservation. Additionally, an approved Archaeological Monitoring Plan will be implemented to address any but unlikely inadvertent finds. In that event, they will be treated pursuant to acceptable protocols and policies of the State. These include immediate stoppage of construction activity, consultation with the State Historic Preservation Division, and implementation of the agreed upon mitigation before commencement of further work within the affected area. C. Mitigative Measures The applicant intends to provide any required off and on-site infrastructure in conjunction with the development of this project. These will include on-site drainage system, landscaping, water, and roadway improvements. All of these will be done in conjunction with the permitting and permit implementation phases of this project. Relative to archaeological features, none recommended for preservation were found within the subject site. However, if any inadvertent discoveries are made during any of the construction or development phases of this project, the protocols of the approved AMP which include consultation with SHPD will be implemented: D. Alternatives121432PrqpQed Project 1. No Project Under the status quo alternative, the site would remain in its • present vacant, vegetative use. Under this scenario, the site would not be utilized to its highest and best use, as envisioned by the General Plan and Kona Community Development Plan. 2. Development Based on Existing A-la Zoning Under this alternative, the area of the requested zoning may still not be utilized agriculturally, given its current condition. The site would probably be subdivided into 5-6 large lots 14 • •