My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0952.001 2022-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0952.001 2022-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 1:06:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2022 1:20:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0952
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/09/06 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2022/10/18 (2020-2022)
(Original Version)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KANUHA: --infrastructure you gotta put a roadway— <br /> VITOUSEK: --within the proposed roadway. [Unintelligible crosstalk] <br /> They wouldn't be responsible for bringing sewer to their property, but they'd be <br /> responsible for putting in a dry sewer line on their property in the roadway that others can <br /> connect to in the event that sewer becomes accessible to the neighborhood. And that <br /> would be a requirement the developer would have to make, but if, if there's no sewer at <br /> the time that somebody wants to build their home then they could build with the <br /> individual wastewater system. So, it would be increasing his costs and that would be a <br /> factor, but it would be providing a level of protection for the environmental resources. <br /> Being within the Kona urban corridor, I don't think we want the proliferation of <br /> individual wastewater systems. <br /> PIPAN: If I may? The Department of Health is kind of the authority on wastewater <br /> treatment. They've responded on this application that IWS, individual wastewater <br /> system, septic systems are appropriate. <br /> KNOWLES: I think, I think the concern is that as a commission we have to be thinking <br /> about the entire landscape. <br /> [Indecipherable crosstalk.] <br /> VITOUSEK: Sure. Sure. Fair enough. Well, my, my question on that line is, is whether <br /> that could be considered but it doesn't seem like it. So, we can get to that in discussion. <br /> CHEN: Can I just say real quick? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes? <br /> CHEN: So, I hear concern, Mike, certainly it is a subject we discussed at length about it. <br /> I mean, if I will have to do an extension of the sewer like that, five hundred or anything <br /> like that, the project's not feasible. We're already stretching the budget; build a roadway <br /> to connect and then even for extension to the south, those are huge expenses. County <br /> dedicable for this small project is already a huge stretch and add to that anything to the <br /> sewer like that, basically the project is a no-go. Or rezone back to 5-a and build two <br /> houses on it. That's all, so. <br /> KANUHA: Are you going to have underground utilities? Is that roadway going to have <br /> underground utilities? <br /> CHEN: I think that's the intention, yes. <br /> 21 <br /> EXHIBIT F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.