COM 0952.001 2022-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

VITOUSEK: I hear you. I hear you. And, you know, if, if we were looking at development projects for nice doctors to come and live in, it's a slam dunk. You know? But we have to treat everything as if it's out of our control— CHEN: I appreciate that. VITOUSEK: --and that you may sell it tomorrow to somebody else. So, we, we have no assurances of who we're dealing with, so all we— CHEN: Right, right, right. VITOUSEK: --can deal with is the paper that's left behind and the conditions. CHEN: Right. I, likewise, I totally appreciate the committee and everybody in the community trying to—I'm along with you. Trying to make the community better. A good place for our future generations. So, I'm totally with you. So, I really appreciate the work you guys do to try to make, you know, make it work, work for the community, make the place better. That's all good. I'm all for that. I'm very conscious about what's best for the environment and for the community. Y We're looking to that, how to, looking to feasibility. Otherwise, if it's not feasible, then we couldn't do it. As I said, we couldn't do it we'll just have to revert to the original A-5 zoning,just make it two lots. Which, I think is a little bit too much for me. I don't need that big a land. I only need one to three to do my thing, right? It's just a complete waste for the community resource, in my mind. So, I'm very conscious in terms of resource. I think that would be a complete waste for precious land for the community. Even if that's what I'll have to do and then it's not good for the community. DEFRANCO: Yeah. Mike, I just want to make a comment too. It's, he's not a developer. Right? I mean, this is, this is what is also different about this project. We're working with a gentleman who wants to move here, have a business here. Put in these lots, do something good. He's not a developer who thinks like that. Who's already thinking how to pass it on and, I mean, that's what we're being presented with. That's what we're being shown. It isn't Stanford Carr, it's not—nothing wrong with Stanford Carr, I'm not trying to say that, but I'm just using the name of a developer. CHEN: I'm using my real name. I [unintelligible] do anything. DEFRANCO: [laughs] I know, I know. But that's what's different here, too. We have to see that that's different here. Right? Go ahead. No, we're discussing. KNOWLES: I agree, certainly, but I also think that, you know, our obligation is to sort 27 EXHIBIT F