Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: So, I would, if that's okaywithyou folks, I would like to propose an <br /> p p <br /> amendment to the motion on the floor. Make a secondary motion that those conditions be <br /> removed and replaced with the similar condition as was used in Kaloko about, and maybe <br /> Christian still has that language. <br /> DEFRANCO: That was in May. <br /> VITOUSEK: About the if endangered species are encountered then they'd be, <br /> appropriate authorities will be notified, and mitigation plans would be— <br /> KNOWLES: Is this a standard template being put into— <br /> JACKSON: We have that condition because we crafted it the last time. I don't have it <br /> right on hand, but it's a very general condition that addresses the same thing. So, we can <br /> use that. But do you want all the endangered species conditions removed? <br /> VITOUSEK: I would— <br /> JACKSON: Could you name off which ones, please? <br /> VITOUSEK: R through W. <br /> JACKSON: R through W. Thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> KANUHA: There's no ohia on that property. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> DEFRANCO: But my question was is that a standard restriction that you put in all <br /> things? Like-- <br /> DARROW: It's a standard, these are standard comments that we receive from Fish and <br /> Wildlife, so. We're just reiterating those comments. <br /> JACKSON: I can add on to that. So, typically we don't include it in permits or rezones <br /> when the property is somewhat built out, but if it's untouched land, if there's a lot of <br /> native vegetation or heavily vegetative property, then we do include this specific <br /> conditions. <br /> 31 <br /> EXHIBIT F <br />