COM 0953.001 2022-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

In 2017, when the applicant came before the Planning Commission this was the proposed site plan that they had submitted to us. It included the existing solar array farm, which is currently there, as well as some of the microbrewery covered lanai, a beer sampling area and parking for the use. Up until this point, it's my understanding as well as what the applicant has submitted that none of this has been developed yet. In 2021, the applicant completed a CPR of the subject property. Where they did provide a separate lot which is for the current PV array so, before you this is the CPR map that was submitted by the applicant. These are the current site photos of the subject property. To the left you have a view of the entrance of the subject property facing east. So, this is at the end of Shipment Road which is formerly known as Slaughter House Road for those of you familiar with the area. Shipman Road continues on to the left in this northern direction and straight ahead is the applicant's existing entrance to the subject property. This is actually the start of TMK 1 and 24, where two side by side roadway and utility easements are located that access the subject property as well as the distilling that's located further east. The photo on your right is a photo of you driving further east on the subject property. However, you're facing north, and it currently shows the existing solar panel array on the property. Other than that, there isn't anything else located on the subject property at the moment. On the screen before you is the applicant's proposed amendments to Condition E. As you can see the applicant has proposed to amend the timing trigger for the fire improvements to be final subdivision approval. And again, the applicant's proposed amendment to Condition I include the timing trigger for the applicant's roadway improvements to be final subdivision approval as well. Currently the Planning Director is recommending forwarding a favorable recommendation to the County Council. However, he is recommending modifications for the applicant's proposed amendments to Condition E and Condition I of Ordinance No.17 65. So, on your screen before you I have the Planning Director's recommended proposed language and his proposed modifications to the request. On the right-hand side, you have the applicant's proposed language which was discussed earlier that he is currently proposing to remove the timing trigger of Certificate of Occupancy to final subdivision approval. And to the right of your screen is the Planning Director's view on this. So, the one thing that I wanted to note about the Planning Director's recommendation is that the Planning Director believes that the timing trigger for this condition should not be changed. The Planning Director understands that the Fire Department will review the plans at some point or another against their Code. Based on that, the Planning Director does not support the applicant's request to defer the timing trigger. However, the Planning Director is recommending to add that last statement that allows for the Fire Department to review this at any time and determine when they feel their Code needs to be made. • So, before you is the proposed request that the Planning Director has with his modifications. I tried to take out the Ramseyer version because it's quite cumbersome when you review a condition of the Ramseyer version. So, as you can see the Planning Director's proposed amendment to Condition E is that prior to receipt of Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall 3 EXHIBIT B(DRAFT)