My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1031.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 1031.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2022 9:47:30 AM
Creation date
9/30/2022 9:47:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
1031
Point
001
Author
Maija Jackson for Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/10/18 (2020-2022)
(Original Version)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LIN: Have you received the background report and recommendation reports from the Planning <br /> Department, and do you agree with their recommendations including the proposed conditions? <br /> ARAI: Yes, we have read the Director's report and we do appreciate the favorable <br /> recommendation and we also agree with the proposed conditions of approval. During our <br /> presentation we would like to speak to some suggested amendments to those conditions. <br /> LIN: Please go-ahead Mr. Arai. <br /> ARAI: Thank you again and good morning, everyone. As always, we appreciate the very <br /> comprehensive presentation by the Planning Department. First of all, we wanted to kind of set <br /> the proper perspective of why this subdivision is being proposed in this particular area. As staff <br /> mentioned these lands were part of a plantation skill sugar operation and that was part of the <br /> `O`okala Sugar Company that started back in the mid-1800's. And I'm sure Mr. Cross would <br /> probably correct me if I was wrong on that, but I tried to do my research. Unfortunate, the <br /> demise of the sugar plantation,there's a need now to kind of rebalance the land uses in the <br /> particular area which includes the subject property. <br /> The proposed 7 lots subdivision is part of that rebalancing that would take advantage, provide for <br /> small scale agricultural opportunities as well as single-family residential uses which is consistent <br /> with existing residential uses immediately mauka of the subject property along the Old <br /> Mamalahoa Highway. And that includes Kukui Camp Village,New Village as well as, I just lost <br /> the name, Milo Village. Sorry, a lot of villages, so. Anyway, as the staff mentioned the <br /> proposed subdivision would take advantage of the existing cane haul road "—"that crisscrosses <br /> the property. And as you can imagine being former cane haul roads, it's very, very, very robust <br /> and would more than be adequately serve the proposed residential traffic to be generated by this <br /> proposed development. We feel that the project site itself and the request of FA-la zoning is <br /> appropriate in this particular area as indicated by the Low-Density Urban designation by the <br /> General Plan. A similar designation by the Hamakua Community Development Plan(CDP) <br /> which defines the project site as within the Urban Growth Boundaries of the `O`okala area. <br /> And, um' let's see. And I should note that one of the things expressed within the Hamakua CDP <br /> is this following statement that I would like to read for you, and which basically defines why this <br /> is an appropriate request in `O`okala. And that particular policy statement from the CDP reads <br /> "to reduce rural sprawl and infrastructure costs, it [the Hamakua CDP] focuses future residential <br /> development in existing villages and towns and seeks to preserve large productive agricultural <br /> lands for agriculture by accommodating rural-residential development close to these urban <br /> centers". So, with that statement we believe that the requested FA-la zoning is the appropriate <br /> land use pattern for this particular area. <br /> So, with that all being said, we'd like to now speak to two (2)proposed changes and to the <br /> conditions of approval. Earlier the staff distributed a sheet that sort of outlines the language that <br /> we would like the Commission to consider. First of all, Condition I speak to the pro-rata share of <br /> improvements to the Old Mamalahoa Highway should it be initiated by the Department of Public <br /> Works and as you note at the very beginning of the condition it says, "The applicant, successors <br /> or assigns". Meaning that if the widening of the Old Mamalahoa Highway does not commence <br /> 4 <br /> EXHIBIT B(DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.