COM 1031.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

prior to the applicant securing final subdivision approval,that in position will carry on to its successors and assigns. So, with that being said, the suggested language that we offer at the end of Condition I basically states that"In the event the pro-rata share is not paid prior to the receipt of final subdivision approval, restrictive covenant(s) in the deeds of all proposed lots shall specify the pro-rata share obligation contained in this condition. In that event, a copy of the proposed covenant(s)to be recorded with the Bureau of Conveyances shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval. A copy of the recorded document shall be filed with the Planning Department upon its receipt from the Bureau of Conveyances." And again, this is just clarifying language to make sure that the proper documentation is put forth in the deeds so that future landowners of these lots are made fully aware of their obligation should the road be widened. The second proposed amendment to the end of Condition S which is the Fair Share Condition. That speaks to Condition H which states that"Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the applicant shall install necessary safety devices for example guardrails along the subject properties Old Mdmalahoa Highway frontage, provided no utility relocation is required, if required by the Department of Public Works". The applicant will not forsake any necessary safety improvements if required by the County but also, let it be known that the subject property has about 1,100 lineal feet of frontage along the Old Mdmalahoa Highway. If deemed necessary the applicant would be willing to provide these safety improvements the guardrails but, understand that that safety improvement not only benefits the 7 lots being proposed by this project, but it will also provide for the safety of all users of that roadway. So, we feel that it is only reasonable and fair that the cost of those improvements should it be required by the County be credited against the applicant's roadway fair share contributions. So, I hope I made myself clear enough, but anyway with that being said we stand ready to answer any questions that the Commissioners may have. UN: Thank you Mr. Arai. Any questions from the Commissioners? Vice Chair Galimba. GALIMBA: So, I wanted to ask about that last condition, the fair share. So, um', I'm to understand that then it would be credited against the road and traffic improvements assessment so the maximum that would be credited would be the $6,699 that's listed in the recommendation. ARAI: That is correct. GALIMBA: So, anything over that would just be part of what they would be supplying to the improvements correct? ARAI: That is correct. UN: Any other questions Commissioners? Commissioner De Luz. 5 EXHIBIT B(DRAFT)