Laserfiche WebLink
4. Evaluation: When permits are in the review process, the uncertainty of EPIC can create <br /> frustration by not providing the submitter a timeline for approval. Often, submitters are <br /> experiencing financial constraints and have contractors on standby awaiting the approval <br /> process. Currently,there is only one lender who will do local construction loans, <br /> ' specifically because of the timeline ambiguity with the permitting process. The EPIC <br /> system does not provide an anticipated approval date, an idea of where in the queue the <br /> permit is or any clear communication on the status of the permit. DPW response: Based <br /> on inquiries, "Where am I in the queue?" is a frequently asked question and therefore on <br /> our"to do"list. Since we are first working to get priority projects permitted, we do not <br /> want to frustrate applicants whose projects are not prioritized without having a solution <br /> for their delay. We simply need more staff and are actively recruiting Plan Reviewers. <br /> We are also working to minimize the backlog in Permit Intake, the process during which <br /> applications are reviewed for completeness or to seek temporary hires to draw down the <br /> backlog. <br /> Conclusion: Employ a tracking system on top of EPIC so applicants and DPW know the <br /> number of permit applications in the queue, being reviewed, and provide a project date to <br /> completion. Conduct a staffing assessment that includes appropriate experience <br /> requirements that is briefed weekly until staffing issues are resolved. <br /> 5. Evaluation: Contractors are unable to view the status of permits in process due to project <br /> naming, PROJECT/PROPERTY OWNER NAME, which hampers their ability for <br /> future building planning. <br /> Conclusion: Consider providing the ability for contractors to have visibility on permits so <br /> they can develop a timeline for the project. Develop an email response system in EPIC <br /> that immediately notifies contractors or`applicants of errors when applying for permits. A <br /> hyperlink option for a refund of fees should be provided in the response. Submitters <br /> should also be able to add users like the owner or contractor after the fact,rather than <br /> having to call the County to do it. <br /> Public Education <br /> 1. Evaluation: The County has many unpermitted structures or additions that often lead <br /> to fires and jeopardize public safety. Public permitting information on the website and <br /> in person is limited and confusing for the common citizen. <br /> Conclusion: Enforcement of unpermitted structures should be revisited to consider <br /> stricter rules and penalties to improve permit compliance. If not already established, <br /> develop a clearer road map that is easy to use. <br /> 9 <br /> 2022 Cost of Government Commission—County of Hawai'i -Final Report <br />