Laserfiche WebLink
2. Evaluation: Known errors found during the permit review and during inspection are <br /> not easily known to permit submitters. This creates common errors to be repeated, <br /> delaying the permit approval process and backlogging the system. It has been <br /> mentioned the non-residential checklist does not accurately reflect what is required at <br /> intake(e.g., code data, type of construction). Educational tools provided to the public <br /> are limited and difficult to navigate. County Building Code requirements have <br /> common errors that may have avenues for relief <br /> Conclusion: Establish a permit"Most Wanted List"that provides education to the <br /> public on common errors and a formal submission checklist, or revamp of current <br /> checklists, should be considered to correct issues before submission. Consider <br /> reevaluating the County Code for common errors to make the requirement more <br /> inclusive without jeopardizing safety. <br /> Oversight of the Program <br /> 1. Evaluation: Potential concerns for the Building Division's ability to complete permits <br /> may be constrained or delayed by other departments. The County permitting process <br /> requires a single department to approve the permit before sending it to the follow-on <br /> depai tnients for approval. Permits often get stuck in a department due to errors hindering <br /> the ability for other departments to review. <br /> Conclusion: Considerations to develop an Internal Evaluation Program "IEP"that <br /> analyzes quarterly the known gaps or deficiencies within the process. Findings should be <br /> reported to department heads to implement remedial action plans to correct determined <br /> deficiencies. Potential areas for evaluation should be staffing,processes and procedures, <br /> and common errors restricting the approval process. <br /> 10 <br /> 2022 Cost of Government Commission—County of Hawai'i -Final Report <br />