Laserfiche WebLink
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> County Managing Director/Department Head Hiring <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Consider modifying the current system of Mayoral appointments of the Managing Director and <br /> department heads to a more permanent employment arrangement hired by County Council <br /> members to improve leadership/management stability, corporate knowledge,morale, continuity <br /> and efficiency. <br /> Evaluation: <br /> While there are various reasons for frequent turnover within several key Hawai`i County <br /> positions, (most notably DPW; six times in the past six years) one solution that our Commission <br /> has discussed to address this County-wide inefficiency is to consider the hire of a long-term <br /> Managing Director. <br /> The National Association of Counties, of which Hawai`i County is a member,has recently <br /> • reported that 43 percent of some 1,322 U.S. counties have an appointed administrator, this is an <br /> increasing national trend. Most of these positions are county board/council appointed,with a <br /> small number appointed by elected county executives. The benefits include: <br /> 1. The County Council,having broader, island-wide scope and experience, is potentially <br /> better suited to hire a Managing Director to run the business of the County. <br /> 2. The Managing Director would hire department heads,potentially minimizing politically <br /> motivated appointments and maintaining consistency beyond four year Mayoral terms. <br /> Department heads would be employed for their expertise, education and experience and <br /> similarly could be terminated, if warranted,without initiating a recall process for the <br /> Mayor. <br /> 3. Longer tenures would bring consistency and a longer view of changes needed by the <br /> County and the time to accomplish big projects like public works,wastewater, roads, <br /> building hospitals etc. This could result in funds being more efficiently spent. <br /> This arrangement existed at one point in Hawai`i County's history and has been considered <br /> across Maui and Kaua`i County recently to address the similar struggles they have encountered <br /> of consistency and inefficiencies in their government structure. There has been disagreement as <br /> to which system best serves its constituents. Personnel stability, management efficiency and <br /> political influence remain major sticking points not heavily favoring either side. <br /> Establishing a major, admittedly controversial revision to an approach such as delineated in <br /> Appendix A may face significant political roadblocks, the most significant would be the need for <br /> a charter change and the time required to implement if/when it were to be approved. There may <br /> q p Pp <br /> be other more tenable approaches that could be tried. <br /> 28 <br /> 2022 Cost of Government Commission—County of Hawai'i -Final Report <br />