My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0010.000 2022-2024
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2022-2024
>
COM 0010.000 2022-2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2023 2:22:10 PM
Creation date
12/13/2022 9:24:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2022-2024
Communication
0010
Point
000
Author
Heather Kimball, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
GOEAC
Comments
GOEAC: Filed - 01/04/23
Document Relationships
AGE GOEAC 2023/01/04 (2022-2024)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2022-2024\Governmental Operations and External Affairs Committee (GOEAC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P�EA <br /> September 29, 2022, HSAC Meeting Agenda Page 110 �ta <br /> 1 a <br /> operation, and safety, as documented by comprehensive submission <br /> requirements...Government CIPprojects would increase compliance. Most of the time <br /> there are change orders and they bid low, sometimes it cost more. I think the key part <br /> of it is that information furnished by....must be available for the public. [Some text is <br /> missing as the audio recording for minutes was inaudible] <br /> ED Parsons: The preemption bill regarding tobacco is being introduced by CM <br /> Kimball and CM Waters. This would repeal the preemption language to return <br /> I <br /> authority to the county to regulate tobacco products. <br /> ! <br /> CMKing:Re-introducing the bill from last year regarding the coastal zone <br /> management act. This would help address the delay in sidewalks being approved to <br /> be built. We are trying to get back to the origins; bill, as people started adding to it <br /> and we want to keep it to the original. j <br /> The EPR legislation, everyone needs to look at that. Where we are charging the waste <br /> that is being created would be charged back. Maybe the water companies pay for <br /> recycling their water bottles. Have not seen the legislation,just saw a flier. <br /> CMKimball: CA just passed their EPR bill which sets the stage. There was a draft <br /> that went through last session that did not pass. <br /> CM King: Can we talk about adding that to the package? <br /> CAVI Kimball: Talking about two bills, 1448, Jon is drafting a version which we have <br /> and is ready to go. We are not getting a clear decision from the DOH on what is an <br /> injection well, the resolution that Jon was drafting is to implore DOH to actually <br /> i <br /> make the rules as far as the decision from the supreme court on what the injection <br /> well is. We have some projects that require an NPDES permit and then we have some <br /> i <br /> that do not. <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> CM Kimball: We have not yet discussed priorities, EPR again, not something we will 1 <br /> i <br /> put forward again but if it is passed as a priority. <br /> CM King. If we can go with the concept of each bill in our package and then <br /> summarize it and add those to our <br /> I <br /> ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.