COM 0898.011 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

AGUINALDO: Okay. I make a motion for County Council Bill No. 194, PL-CCI-2022- 000002, a favorable recommendation. I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to County Council on Bill No. 194,based on the Planning Director's recommendation, which shall be adopted. DANIELE: I'll second that. LIN: Okay, so it was moved by Commissioner Aguinaldo and seconded by Commissioner Daniele to send a favorable recommendation for this agenda item. So, now discussion? Is there a specific language that we want to add into this proposal right here? I like Mafia's idea of putting an exact time, you know, effective date. Saying that your application will expire on this date or is effective from here to here anything after that you'll have to come in and reapply or go through the process again. I welcome anybody's feedback regarding that. INABA: Chair if I may. LIN: Yeah, go ahead. INABA: Sorry, I just want to clarify to make sure that we are all on the same page. What Corporation Counsel referred to I believe was Section 4 of Bill 194 as to the effective date of Bill 194 if passed. So, were clear as to moving forward and somebody or somebody yesterday who get their rezoning bill passed, they still have the administrative extension that was approved in— AGUINALDO: Um' moving forward, right? INABA: Yes, only moving forward. So, somebody yesterday came in, they got their rezoning with the 5-year admin extension language in, they still have rights to that 5-year admin extension. So, if someone comes in 2 weeks from now or sorry after Bill 194 is passed, if it passes, they will not be entitled, there will be no language allowed and they would not be able to have a 5-year admin extension. KERN: Right, so, what we would do is we would look at the application, we would look at the general overall time, and in this case if it's a 5 and 5 we would look at it as 10 and we would just put 10 years. There is no language of administrative time extensions in there, it's just 10 years and at the time 10 years is up and if it hasn't been complied with then it goes back to the process. Back to the Department, back to the Commission and back to Council for reapproval essentially. LIN: Okay, got it. INABA: And just on the language as intended. If we look at condition, sorry, I'm getting mixed up, conditions and sections here. Um' within Bill 194, Section(b) that last part the additional language"Unless specifically authorized by the council, extensions of time to satisfy conditions may not be allowed by the director". I'll just state on the record if want to remove that language and replace it with the language that is truly intended, I could read that language to 13 EXHIBIT B(DRAFT)