Laserfiche WebLink
a. The identity and scope of valued cultural historical or natural resources in. the <br />petition area, including the extent to which traditional and customary native <br />Hawaiian rights are exercised in the petition area; <br />b. The extent to which those resources including traditional and customary native <br />Hawaiian rights, will be affected or impaired by the proposed action; and <br />c. The feasible action, if any, to be taken by the Authority to reasonably protect <br />any valued cultural, historical or natural resources including any existing <br />traditional and customary native Hawaii rights. <br />In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A -26(2)(A), the <br />proposed development will not have any substantial adverse environmental or <br />ecological effect, except as such adverse effect is minimized to the extent practicable <br />and clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interest. In <br />considering the significance of potential environmental effects, the Director shall consider <br />the sum of those effects that adversely affect the quality of the environment and shall <br />evaluate the overall and cumulative effects of the action on the Special Management Area. <br />Such adverse effects shall include, but not be limited to, the potential cumulative impact of <br />individual developments, each one of which taken in itself might not have a substantial <br />adverse effect and eliminate planning options. <br />The proposed project did not meet the criteria in State law for the requirement of <br />an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. While the subject parcel <br />is located within the Special Management Area, no work is proposed within the shoreline <br />setback area. Additionally, no work is proposed within the State Right -of -Way (ROW) and <br />as such no HRS 205A trigger was identified. <br />In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A, the proposed <br />development is consistent with the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter <br />205A, HRS, and Special Management Area guidelines contained in Rule No. 9 of the <br />Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. <br />The purpose of Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) and Special <br />Management Area Rules and Regulations of the County of Hawaii, is to preserve; protect, <br />and where possible,to restore the natural resources of the coastal zone areas. Therefore, <br />special controls on development within an area along the shoreline are necessary to avoid <br />permanent loss of valuable resources and the foreclosure of management options. The <br />objectives and policies of Chapter 205A, HRS include, but are not limited to, the protection <br />of coastal recreational resources, historic resources, scenic and open space resources, <br />coastal ecosystems, marine resources, beaches, and controlling development in coastal <br />hazard areas. <br />Coastal Recreational Resources: The subject property is located across the street <br />from the Reeds Bay Ice Ponds, which is frequently used for recreational activities. The <br />proposed project is more than 80 -feet from the Ice Ponds, with a new roadway and drainage <br />system recently constructed between the project area and the pond. This project will not <br />impact access or the enjoyment of the ponds or larger Reeds Bay area. The project will be <br />constructed with drainage and runoff mitigation to prevent impact to the ponds from <br />stormwater. <br />Historic and Cultural Resources: Although no commissioned archaeological <br />survey of the site was conducted, it is highly unlikely that any historic sites would be found <br />IPA <br />