Laserfiche WebLink
Timeline for Expensing Reporting of Funds. <br /> • Performance reports described above are due to the county within sixty days after June <br /> 30 of the contractual year. Failure to submit on-time reports results in ineligibility for at <br /> least the next year and all subsequent fiscal years until that written report is submitted to <br /> and accepted by the Council. <br /> • The Department of Finance's RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATED TO STANDARDS <br /> FOR GRANTS OF PUBLIC FUNDS TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION. Rule 3.3 <br /> Application for Grants. (b) do not align with HCC Chapter 2 Article 25. Additionally, Rule <br /> 3.5 Funding. (b) states that "Payments shall be made monthly on a reimbursement <br /> method. However, the first month's payment, which shall not be less than ten percent of <br /> the total grant to the organization, shall not be made until the organization submits a tax <br /> clearance from the State Director of Taxation." <br /> Funding is currently being provided 50% after contract execution, with the remainder being <br /> distributed after submission of a 6-month progress report, approximately September and <br /> February. <br /> Observation 5 <br /> Update Department of Finance Rules and Regulations. <br /> We suggest that the Department of Finance regularly reviews and updates its rules and <br /> regulations to align with actual timing and funding. • <br /> Additional Considerations for other areas of the code as written. <br /> Section 2-139 outlines the procedure for awarding grants, specifying certain criteria for handling <br /> specific grants. However, other sections, such as 2-137 and 2-138, which cover Eligible <br /> organizations and Conditions for grants, apply universally to all grants awarded to nonprofits.This <br /> has led to confusion because while eligibility and conditions apply broadly, the procedures for <br /> handling them do not. <br /> Additionally, consolidating these grant types under one Article has caused some additional <br /> confusion with regard to the most appropriate use. Grant-in-Aid (GIA) funds are distinct from <br /> Contingency Relief Funds (CRF). CRFs act as a financial safety net for unexpected events and <br /> emergencies, consistent with the operations and activities of the County. However, blending <br /> distinct grant types under one section increases the risk that CRFs are used for events that are <br /> not county-related projects. In assessing whether a violation of gifting of public funds has taken <br /> place, one criterion is whether funds awarded serve a fundamental purpose of government. The <br /> implications of merging these distinct programs and their impact on fund allocation must be <br /> carefully considered. <br /> In recent years, the county has significantly expanded its grant offerings under the category of <br /> "Other Grants." These include programs such as the Affordable Housing Production Program, <br /> The Homelessness and Housing Fund,the Homeowners Assistance Fund, and others managed <br /> at various county departments.While certain"Other Grants"adhere to a codified framework, such <br /> 9 <br />