Laserfiche WebLink
• Some programs had multiple funding sources that lacked programmatic accounting codes, <br /> which made expenditures indistinguishable from other areas of operations <br /> • Several NPOs provided system-generated reports in place of receipts <br /> • Some NPOs did not track their program expenditures against their activities <br /> Other exceptions or questionable practices observed. <br /> • In 14 instances, programs were funded, but had a questionable public purpose or benefit <br /> • A program was funded, including travel for training/conferences, which is prohibited <br /> • For several programs, the difference in grant fund dollars and its impact on baseline <br /> operations was indistinguishable from ongoing operations <br /> • One recipient passed some of their dollars through to a sub-recipient. Sub-recipients are <br /> not addressed in Article 25 <br /> • Entities purchased equipment with long-term value for short-term programs. The <br /> disposition of equipment is not currently addressed in Article 25 <br /> • In one instance, the program did not align to a required eligible purpose as outlined in <br /> section 2-137 (3) <br /> • Some programs included small gifts or stipends that may qualify as perks. Perquisites are <br /> prohibited. <br /> • Our observation indicates that some organizations have operated for an extended period. <br /> Yet, they may not exhibit the proficiency required for the specific grant fund they are <br /> applying for. <br /> 4 <br />