Laserfiche WebLink
Heather Kimball, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />June 28, 2024 <br />Page 2 <br />zoning designation from the current Multiple -Family Residential-3,000 square feet (RM- <br />3) zoning designation. <br />The subject property was rezoned from RS-10 to RM-3 with the objective of <br />constructing a multifamily student housing complex. Condition B (time to complete <br />construction) of Ordinance No. 12-132 required compliance by October 25, 2017, or five <br />years from the effective date of the subject ordinance. The applicants obtained Final Plan <br />Approval, on January 23, 2015, and a building permit was issued, on October 24, 2017, <br />for a 3-unit student apartment building. Additionally, pursuant to Condition L, the <br />applicants remitted a fair share contribution in the amount of $23,710.05, per a June 26, <br />2014 letter from the Planning Department, which will be reimbursed. <br />However, according to the applicants, the project was unsuccessful due to <br />construction costs being higher than anticipated, including installation of a costly <br />wastewater treatment system as the full scope of the project could not be served by septic <br />tanks. The closest County sewer line is located along Kawili Street, about 1,100 feet <br />south of the subject property. Although no administrative time extension was issued, even <br />with this option, Compliance with Condition B (tone to complete construction) would <br />have lapsed on October 25, 2022. In 2023, the applicants requested to void the building <br />permit and repeal the change of zone. <br />As the landowners have no intention of developing any uses permitted in the RM- <br />3 zoning district, they are requesting that the Planning Director initiate rezoning of the <br />property to its original RS-10 zoning, pursuant to Condition P of the subject ordinance, <br />which allows the Director to initiate reversion of land to its original zoning or rezone to a <br />more appropriate designation should conditions of approval not be met or substantially <br />complied with in a timely fashion. <br />Since the subject parcel was rezoned, there have not been any significant land use <br />regulatory changes in this area. The proposed reversion to the original RS-10 zoning <br />would be consistent with the General Plan's Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide <br />(LUPAG) map Medium Density Urban Designation, which allows for a "village and <br />neighborhood commercial and single fancily and multiple family residenlial and related <br />fitnetions (multiple family residential - tip to 35 units per acre). The State Land Use <br />designation for the subject property is Urban. The Hilo Community Development Plan <br />(CDP), adopted in 1975, suggests residential uses in this area. <br />The subject parcel is not situated within the Special Management Area and the <br />area has been extensively developed. Additionally, there are no known <br />archaeological, historical, or cultural resources and no protected/endangered floral or <br />faunal resources found on the subject parcel. <br />