Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br />C <br />90. Not only that, Adams admitted under oath that at least one of these females he <br />personally handpicked, performed duties of a film commissioner from Hilo, Hawaii. <br />91. NOT ONLY THAT, Adams admitted under oath that film commissioner was not <br />only performed out of Kona and that even Freitas, the permanent hire, was allowed to perform her <br />duties as a film commissioner from other locations. <br />92. Kona location excuse was a lie by Adams designed to hide his sexually motivated <br />reasons for hiring young females as a film commissioner so he can ogle them. <br />93. Given the pathological lies made by Mr. Adams to Hawaii County Council and <br />Plaintiff, he acted deceitfully and with a sexual motivated bias that led to his predetermination to <br />hire Freitas and ensured that due to this hiring bias, she would receive the position. <br />94. The nine -day time frame in which the position was held open for "public <br />application" is absurdly narrow. <br />95. The pathological misinformation and fraudulent information that was conveyed by <br />Mr. Adams to the County Council also displays evidence of disparate treatment on the part of Mr. <br />Adams, as hiring manager. <br />96. The lies and misinformation with respect to the location of the position is. yet <br />another display of evidence of disparate treatment on the part of Mr. Adams, as hiring manager. <br />97. The ten months of delay in posting the job opening and nine days of keeping the <br />position open provides further evidence of both disparate treatment and motive by Mr. Adams <br />against Plaintiff and in favor of Freitas. <br />98. Not only that, during these 10 months where Adams would not, even post a Film <br />Commissioner job for open recruitment, he kept placing young attractive unqualified females into <br />the position so he can ogle them. <br />-14- <br />EXHIBIT "A" <br />Page 14 of 25 <br />Pg14 <br />