My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 266 Draft 01 2024-2026
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2024-2026
>
RES 266 Draft 01 2024-2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2025 3:35:48 PM
Creation date
8/7/2025 8:54:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2024-2026
Bill/Resolution
266
Draft
01
Introducer
Mark D. Disher, Deputy Corporation Counsel
Referred To
FC
Action 1
FC-78: Recommended adoption - 8/19/2025
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 266-25 & FC-78 - 9/3/25
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
9/3/2025
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
9/3/2025
Ayes
8-Galimba, Hustace, Inaba, Kagiwada, Kierkiewicz, Kimball, Onishi, and Villegas
Noes
0
Absent
1-Kaneali'i-Kleinfelder
Excused
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2025-09-03 2024-2026
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2024-2026\Council
AGE FC 2025-08-19 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2024-2026\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0428.000 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2024-2026
REP FC 078 2025-08-19 2024-2026
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2024-2026\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br />sustained substantial damages, including, but not limited to economic loss and emotional distress, <br />and is therefore entitled to recover special, general, and compensatory damages in such amounts <br />as shall be shown at a trial or hearing hereof. <br />COUNT 4: NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION <br />(AGAINST DEFENDANT HAWAII COUNTY) <br />133. Plaintiff reiterates and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs of this <br />Complaint. <br />134. Asset forth above, Defendant Hawaii County and/or their employees, agents and/or <br />representatives had a duty of care to Plaintiff in making sure that Adams was properly supervised <br />and managed in exercising and using his power and authority when performing his County job and <br />duties and engaging in hiring for County jobs. <br />135. As set forth above, Defendant Hawaii County and/or their employees, agents and/or <br />representatives knew, should have known and/or were aware that Adams was abusing, misusing <br />and was negligent in performance of his official duties by engaging in discriminatory hiring <br />practices as described above and Defendant Hawaii County did nothing to correct or prevent this <br />behavior by Adams. <br />136. Defendant Hawaii County and/or their employees, agents and/or representatives <br />breached their duties of care to Plaintiff. <br />137. As a direct, proximate and legal cause of the negligence, gross negligence or <br />recklessness of Defendant Hawaii County and/or their employees, agents and/or representatives, <br />Plaintiff sustained the special and general damages described herein in the amount to be proven <br />and shown at trial. <br />138. All of the named above Defendants' above -described actions have caused Plaintiff <br />-19- <br />EXHIBIT "A" Pg19 <br />Page 19 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.