My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0018.000 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0018.000 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 11:46:07 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:14:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0018
Point
000
Author
Stephen K. Yamashiro, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Council: Pass Bill 9 on 2nd & final rdg - 01/24/01 Council: Passed on 1st reading & adopt PC-3 - 01/10/0 PC-3: Recs. Bill 9 pass First Reading - 12/19/00 PC: Bill 10 amended to Bill 10, Draft 2 - 12/10/00
Communications - File Code
ZNG/KN
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 01/10/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Council
AGE COUNCIL 01/24/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Council
AGE PC 12/19/2000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 009 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 009 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 010 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 010 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 010 Draft 02 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 010 Draft 02 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 010 Draft 03 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 010 Draft 03 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0018.001 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0018.001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0018.002 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0018.002 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
REP PC 003 12/19/2000 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 003 12/19/2000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 004 12/19/2000 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable James Y Arakakt, Chairman <br /> <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> Page 2 <br /> General Plan and the Hawaii State Plan Seaton 205-3 1 states that district boundary <br /> amendments involving lands of fifteen acres or less, shall be determmed by the <br /> appropriate county land use decision making authority and shall not require <br /> consideration by the land use commission pursuant to Section 205-4 The standard of <br /> review for a boundary amendment consideration shall be given to the following (a) <br /> The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable goals, <br /> policies, standards, and courses of action of the General Plan and implementing, <br /> ordinances, plans and documents No amendment shall be approved unless tt conforms <br /> to the General Plan (b) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to <br /> the applicable district standards According to the Land Use Commission Rules, one of <br /> the standards for considering an area for urban reclassification states that "In <br /> determining urban growth for the next ten years, or in amending the boundary, land <br /> contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non- <br /> contiguous land, and particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county <br /> general plans " The subJect property does conform to this standard as it is proximate <br /> to the already urban subdivisions The subJect property is also contiguous to the <br /> proposed Bayview Estates Phase I[, the existing Bayview Estates Phase I, Keauhou <br /> Estates, and the Villas at Keauhou Subdivisions urban areas <br /> The Urban boundary request also conforms to the General Plan Land Use <br /> Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map which designates this area for Urban <br /> Expansion Urban Expansion Area allows for a mix of high density, medium density, <br /> low density, industrial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be <br /> desirable, but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not yet been <br /> determined This request is to allow an urban development, a planned low-density <br /> residential subdivision Low Density Urban Development is defined as Residential <br /> uses at a density of four units per acre and certain neighborhood commercial uses are <br /> permitted within this designation The LUPAG Map component of the General Plan is <br /> a representation of the document's goals, policies, standards and courses of action It <br /> is also a graphic depiction of the physical relaUOnshtp between the vanous land uses <br /> The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the <br /> County The area under consideration is consistent with the urban form established for <br /> this section of the North Kona District as depicted on the LUPAG Map <br /> The Kona Regional Plan, adopted by the Planning Commission in 1984, <br /> recommends the area for residential four units per acre The applicant's proposal is a <br /> single family residential subdivision [t is adJacent to the proposed Bayview Estates <br /> Phase II Subdivision The proposed reclassification is for a similar urban land use <br /> designation Thus, the requested boundary amendment would be in the direction of <br /> fulfilling the low density range plans, in this particular case <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.