COM 0084.000 2000-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

C. Mitigative Measures The existing nght-of--way to the property is twenty (20) feet wide However, any necessary improvements that need to be made to comply with County requirements will be complied with by the applicant D. Alternatives to the Proposed Project 1. No Project Under tlus no action alternative the property would maintain its present use as a single- farruly dwelling However, given the reasons listed previously, this no action alternative would not result in the most productive use of the subject property 2. Alternative Commercially-Zoned Site Under this alternative, the applicant would be forced to seek another site that is already commercially zoned This would eliminate the possible impacts on surrounding property owners as they would already be aware of the property's commercial use However, this is not an econorrucally sound alternative to the applicant 3. Evaluation of Alternatives Any impacts to the area's physical and social infrastructure as a result of the requested change of zone seem to be instgmficant Any possible impacts that may anse out of the land use change for the subject property would be addressed and mitigated by the applicant Also, the proposed use of the property is consistent with surrounding land uses in the area, and would be consistent with the land use objectives sought by the County's General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map Craven these reasons, it seems that the best alternative for the subject property is the requested change of zone alternative 1X. REGULATORY ANALYSIS A. General Plan LUPAG Mao The requested change of zone for the subject property would result in a use that would be consistent with the surrounding land uses in the area, and would also be consistent with the land use objectives sought by the County's General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Envvonmental Report TtvIIC 2-2-34 95 Page I~'o 7