Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> and energy costs; cost of living; exclusionary vs. inclusionary land use patterns; traffic <br /> <br /> congestion, traffic safety, and highway costs; accessibility for those without personal <br /> autos; number and length of automobile trips required; two-lane "mainstreet and country <br /> road" transportation networks vs. "pods" along limited access, multi-lane highways; <br /> visual preference surveys; impacts on surrounding communities; protection of <br /> agnculture; and actual tax burden. Provide the Ahwahnee Principles as examples of <br /> planning principles in use by commumhes which have chosen livability. Provide <br /> presentations of plans based on livability, by qualified presenters who favor livability, as <br /> well as advocates for sprawl patterns. GP, and the plamm~g of public improvements and <br /> zoning, as per III. must then reflect community choices. <br /> Why? <br /> • The current GP has goals and policies which describe livable communities <br /> (convenience, accessibility, protection of agriculture, etc.). But the actual practice within <br /> the County and within the State Department of Transportation is to implement auto- <br /> dependent sprawl, which ~s more expensive for both the tax base and in cost of living <br /> than compact development. The public must be given real choices after comprehensive <br /> education about the actual differences. <br /> • Sprawl development, which creates singlo-occupancy vehicle commuting requires <br /> highway lane additions for which federal funding is not and will not be available. On <br /> average, it costs $30,000 in highway improvements for each commuter vehicle added to <br /> the highway. That cost will have to be shouldered to a large extent by local taxpayers if <br /> we do not make the land use/transportation pattern support alternative access. <br /> V. Make an F]ement for ACCESS, both tradiUOnal choices to give people in every <br /> community the option of anon-commuter lifestyle. shoreline and mauka access, and for <br /> bicycles and pedestrians. Incorporate in this element the detailed shoreline access plan <br /> prepared in 1979 by the Planning Department as well as provision for master planning <br /> access systems within each distnct and review of all subdivision applications for <br /> inclusion of access ways. <br /> ~1hy1 <br /> • The Department of Public Works and the State Department of Transportation both <br /> continually cite the lack of improvements or even consideration of these kinds of access <br /> ways on the failure of the County GP to provide for them. <br /> • The continuation of Hawaiian cultural practices and values regarding the public trust is <br /> one of the most valuable things Hawaii has to offer to the world culture. As such it is <br /> also of major economic value to us as a visitor destination. <br /> VI. Include geologic hazards -lava flows, earthquakes, subsidence, locally generated <br /> tsunami - as an IIement, equal to Drainage. Include measures to lower the risk to health <br /> <br />