My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0229.000 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0229.000 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2017 12:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:25:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0229
Point
000
Author
Mayor - Kim, Harry
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Council: Bill 67 deferred - 07/06/01 Council: Amend Bill 66 to Bill 66, Dr. 2 - 07/06/01 Council: Amend Bill 67 to Bill 67, Dr. 2 - 06/20/01 Council: Pass Bill 66 on 1st rdg & adopt PC-24 - 06/20/01 PC-24: Recs. Bill 66 pass First Reading - 06-05-01 PC-25: Recs. Bill 67 pass First Reading - 06-05-01
Communications - File Code
ZNG/KN
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 07/06/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Council
AGE PC 06/05/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 066 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 066 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 067 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 067 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0229.005 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
ORD 2001-002 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2001
ORD 2001-063 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2001
ORD 2001-063 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2001
REP PC 024 06/05/2001 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 024 06/05/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 025 06/05/2001 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 025 06/05/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17. ALISH: The project area is not classified as having any agricultural importance on the <br />State Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of <br />Hawaii (ALISH) Map. <br />18. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: Soils within the subject <br />property are classified as "E" (Very Poor) for agricultural productivity by the Land Study <br />Bureau. <br />19. Fauna: A faunal survey of the subject property was not conducted. The applicant <br />believes that rare or endangered faunal species are not likely to be found within the <br />project site or its immediate area. The applicant makes reference to a 1998 survey <br />conducted by Philip Bruner on a parcel located approximately 600 feet to the south of the <br />project site. The faunal study of this site concluded that fauna consisted largely of <br />introduced bird species. Other mammals observed included the Indian mongoose, cats, <br />dogs, rats and pigs. The study found no evidence of any endemic or endangered species <br />of fauna within the studied site. The endangered Pueo and 'Io may occasionally forage or <br />roost on the studied site. <br />20. Flora: No floral study was conducted on the subject property. The applicant makes <br />reference to a 1998 botanical survey on a property located approximately 600 feet to the <br />south of the project site. According to this survey, floral resources within the studied site <br />consisted of guinea grass with stands of koa haole and scattered kiawe trees. He also <br />identified a total of 70 plant species, of which six (6) were native. Two of these were <br />considered possibly indigenous and the remaining four (4) found to be indigenous. <br />According to Figure 13 of the applicant's archaeological inventory survey, the majority of <br />the subject property is either landscaped or previously bulldozed. Given the substantially <br />improved nature of the project site, the presence of endangered floral species is unlikely. <br />21. Archaeological Resources: An archaeological inventory survey of the subject property <br />was conducted by Haun and Associates on February 2, 2001. The survey identified three <br />(3) sites; a historic wall, petroglyph and a complex of 26 agricultural features possibly <br />associated within the Kona Field System. The study assessed all three sites as solely <br />significant for its ability to yield information important for research on prehistory and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.