My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.068 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0212.068 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:47:10 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:45:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0212
Point
068
Author
Kathy Dorn
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 4/24/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE FC 04/24/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0212.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Nuclear Sunset: Economic Costs of the Canadian Nuclear Industn httP://am~~.ccm.org/sunsetl.html <br /> In the Spring of 1994, Natural Resources Minister Anne McLellan hired Toronto <br /> lawyer Stephen Goudge as a "fact-finder" in the dispute between MDS/Nordion <br /> and AECL. In October 1994, McLellan ordered AECL to resume discussions <br /> with MDS/Nordion, and the two parties suspended arbitration proceedings in <br /> favour of "facilitated discussions". On October 11, 1994, Goudge stated that the <br /> conflict would be resolved within six to eight weeks. [147] In December 1994, <br /> Nordion Vice-President Ian Mumford stated that he expected the dispute to be <br /> resolved within two weeks. [148) One year later, in December 1995, Mumford <br /> stated that he expected a resolution of the dispute "within a couple of months". <br /> [149] In late 1995, MDS/Nordion reportedly made a $140 million proposal to <br /> build ttvo reactors and a reprocessing facility- at AECL's Chalk River Nuclear <br /> Laboratories. It is not clear how much taxpayers will be expected to pay, and how <br /> much MDSlNordion will ultimately pay. An} investment of public funds is <br /> highly risky at best, and will leave taxpayers ~F ith a lasting legacy of deadly <br /> radioactive waste --particularly from the production of Molybdem,:tn-99 (known <br /> as Moly-99). <br /> In the production process for Moly-99, hig1~1} enriched uranium is eradiated, then <br /> dissolved in acid to extract the Moly-99. This results in an acidic high level liquid <br /> waste of the same type created by plutonium extraction in nuclear weapons <br /> programs. The waste has the potential to go critical (i.e. undergo fission chain <br /> reactions leading to a nuclear explosion). This waste is currently kept in a single <br /> 24,000 litre Fissile Solution Storage Tank (FISST), which is estimated to contain <br /> about 1 million terabecquerels (TBq) of fission products. Moly-99, with a <br /> half-life of about sixty-six hours; decays into technetium-99m, which is <br /> considered ideal for medical diagnostic purposes because it has a half-life of only <br /> six hours, and thus poses less risk to patients. The technetium-99m is used to <br /> 'label' chemical compounds which migrate to ~ arious organs, allowing an image <br /> to be detected from the gamma rays emitted. AECL currently produces most of <br /> the world's Moly-99, and the $50 million a year sales [150] represent about one <br /> half of Nordion's business. <br /> If it wishes to stay in the radioisotope business, AECL needs to build at least two <br /> new reactors, since the NRU is scheduled to be shut down in the year 2000, and a <br /> second reactor is needed for back-up. Yet it is unlikeh~ that AECL and Nordion <br /> will be able to compete with low-cost production from existing reactors in the US <br /> and Europe. At the same time, if the government decides to cut its losses and get <br /> out of the radioisotope business, it must compensate MDS/Nordion. <br /> Investment in new radioisotope production reactors is ill-advised because new <br /> producers are set to enter the Moly-99 market to compete with AECL and <br /> of 64 oa/us/~~ zz:zl.a~ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.