My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0376.000 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0376.000 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2017 12:08:58 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:33:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0376
Point
000
Author
Constance R. Kiriu, Legislative Auditor
Communications - Referred To
HSEDC
Comments
Council: Approves HSEDC Rept. 8 - 11/21/01 HSEDC: Close file - 11/6/01
Communications - File Code
REV
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 11/21/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Council
AGE HSEDC 11/06/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Human Services & Economic Development Committee (HSEDC)
COM 0376.001 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.002 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.003 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.004 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.005 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.006 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.007 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.008 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.009 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.011 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.012 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0376.013 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
RES 049 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of life for animals, but also the citizens' perception of Animal Control. <br />The Study Team spent a total of 24.75 hours observing field personnel. Through the <br />observation of field personnel and their working conditions, an insight regarding staffing <br />levels, shift scheduling and current beat structure was obtained. With this information, <br />matched against current industry standards, NACA's recommendations include: <br />The agency should allocate enough field positions as to ensure the needs of <br />citizens are met without undue delays. All calls should be answered before the end <br />of each day. Based on the "calls for service" model, the agency should have a <br />minimum of 14.4 officers on duty, for day -shift. <br />Q With an increase in staffing levels, HIHS should introduce full weekend and limited <br />evening service, and a later end time to daytime shifts. <br />Z) MHS should phase-out all their animal containment units and replace them with a <br />commercial model typically used in the Animal Control profession. All containment <br />units should be fitted with temperature gauges, which may be monitored by officers <br />within the cab of each truck. If needed, air conditioners should be installed. A strict <br />policy or mandate should be introduced regarding animal transport in HIHS <br />vehicles. <br />Q Those employees that require "badging" or recertification should be offered this <br />training as soon as possible. <br />IJ With an increase in kennel staffing levels, HIHS should discontinue the use of field <br />personnel in the kennel and customer service areas. <br />Occupational Safety Procedures <br />An important aspect of any NACA evaluation is to review the occupational safety <br />procedures of the agency. This analysis encompassed the field and kennel areas within <br />HIHS. <br />The need for this review is to not only protect the employee from injury or harm, but to also <br />shield the employer from issues and claims directly resulting from deficiencies within this <br />area. <br />During the on-site process, the Study Team was provided occupational injurylillness <br />statistics and general safety procedures, resulting in recommendations regarding employee <br />safety issues. Some of these recommendations include: <br />U The use of protective equipment/clothing (to include safety footwear) by the agency <br />should be mandated to guarantee employee safety and protect the HIHS from <br />liability. <br />Executive Summary - 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.