Laserfiche WebLink
totalling $816.9 million. <br /> In effect, federal taxpayers provided a one billion dollar subsidy for the production of a surplus <br /> federal heavy water inventory. Nevertheless, AECL and the federal government have recently <br /> agreed to forego a large part of heavy water sales to South Korea and Romania, giving over $300 <br /> million worth of business to Ontario Hydro instead. At the same time, the federal government has <br /> supplied about $300 million worth of heavy water, free of charge, for a scientific experiment. This <br /> failure to obtain a return on the federal heavy water inventory in effect adds dollar for dollar to the <br /> federal government budget deficit. <br /> Conclusion <br /> Key decision points on public subsidies for the nuclear industry include the federal budget in 1996, <br /> and the expiry of the federaUprovincial Memorandum of Understanding (also known as the <br /> CANDU Owners Group agreement) on nuclear funding on April I, 1997. The federal parliament's <br /> Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development has already recommended that <br /> the government should "terminate its involvement in the CANDU Owners Group". Cabinet should <br /> heed that advice. <br /> The secret government review of the nuclear industry conducted in 1995 should be made public. A <br /> public consultation process should be launched to consider the phaseout of public support for the <br /> nuclear industry, in advance of the expiry of the federaUprovincial Memorandum of Understanding. <br /> <br /> In keeping with current spirit of fiscal restraint, the federal government should simply end its <br /> subsidies to AECL. If the nuclear industry is as promising as it claims, it should be able to provide <br /> <br /> its own financing and demonstrate that it can survive independently. Otherwise the sun should be <br /> <br /> allowed to set on the Canadian nuclear industry. Taxpayers have already paid too much. <br /> 5 <br /> <br />