My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.228 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0212.228 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 2:01:23 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:46:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0212
Point
228
Author
Lois-ellen Datta, Ph.D.
Communications - Referred To
Council
Comments
Presented: Council - 5/7/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 05/07/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
BIL 062 Draft 01 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
COM 0212.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> From'. lols~llln Datta Dafla Analysts al' Hawall Cnunly Cnvncll Gage 2 of 5 \4ednasday. May O). 1991 1'd8:04 GM To: Coimcliman James Arakakl <br /> 2 <br /> YOUR WALLET AND MINE: BENEFITING FROM AfJD PAYING FOR FOOD IRRADIATION <br /> Lois-ellin DatTa, Ph.D. <br /> In V~/ashington state, a First American tribe That traditionally fished along The salmon rivers are catching <br /> fewer and fewer salmon, ruining a carefully nurtured business. There are fewer salmon because with <br /> more dams, more fish ladders are needed. There is not enough money to build all these needed fish <br /> ladders---and to buy some other things Washington State residents expect from their government--- <br /> because of V~/HOOPS. <br /> WHOOPS is the fiscal black hole of Interest payments on state bonds authorized years ago to finance <br /> the Hanford area nuclear power plants. These bonds come due in a few years. Then the giant sucking <br /> sound will be money from the wallets of Washington state taxpayers who were kids v~ihen the bonds <br /> were approved in a burst of fiscal irresponsibility on the part of the legislature. Beguiled by promises of <br /> big profits, job creation and a rising tide of nuclear-stimulated prosperity, the legislators approved sale <br /> of state bonds To support The nuclear facilities without obtaining a full, objective, comprehensive <br /> analysis of the costs and benefits of the effort---and ignoring as 'terroristic nay-sayers" those warning <br /> about problems ahead. The nuclear plants proved uneconomical and risky. They went out of <br /> operation before returning increased revenues, paying back their costs or covering The interest <br /> payments and principal on those bonds. <br /> Sound familiar? This may be happening on the Big Island in approval of a County bond issue To <br /> support The proposed irradiation facility. The irradiation facility is not a nuclear power plant. However, <br /> many of the fiscal and liability issues are similar. <br /> About a week ago, the County Council Finance committee heard our Mayor characterize many of the <br /> 170 plus people who had come to make their voices heard as "economic terrorists." The majority of <br /> The Finance Committee---with the exception of Council Member Curtis Tyler--- voted To give The Mayor <br /> close To a blank check in a bill stating their support of a food irradiation facility plus an up-TO $2 million <br /> immediate do\Ain payment. They did this after hearing that there was no independent, thorough <br /> analysis of \~rhat the benefits might be, and who would get These benefits or of what the costs might <br /> be, and who would pay these costs. Glowing claims that prosperity is just around the irradiation <br /> corner, yes: evidence and analysis, no. <br /> Statements about The lack of a Thorough, independent analysis of costs and benefits were made by-- <br /> among others--- a University of Hawaii economics professor who is for irradiation but against fiscal <br /> irresponsibility, the President of Isomedix who made crystal clear that Isomedix builds irradiation plants <br /> and it is up to growers and the County to figure out themselves if they can break even or make a <br /> profit, and an agricultural economist who does not support irradiation primarily because only a few <br /> would conceivably benefit \Aihile many of us could wind up paying a whole lot. People who are <br /> spending their own money tend to look a lot more carefully...and money "from the County" is actually <br /> our money, and comes from our wallets. <br /> So, what's to look aT here? First, according to interviews with the County Office of Research and <br /> Development, the R&D Office hasn't done anything like an analysis of who will benefit and ho~v much, <br /> and who will pay, and how much. They were counting on Isomedix to do this analysis. But when <br /> Isomedix made their 3 hour presentation To The County Council's Finance Committee, Isomedix said, in <br /> shocked tones, "MOI? Do an analysts? Up to you guys---the growers and the County---To figure out <br /> whether you can make This work economically." <br /> Their negotiating position suggested, however, that They've done the same rough analysis some of us <br /> have. Isomedix is acting as if They Think it will take mega-dollars To handle marketing and distribution. <br /> They indicated, in response to the question, "What would iT Take for you To bring your plant to Hawaii?" <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.