COM 0493.047 2000-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Also in almost universal use, revenue bonds for water development are the best financial instrument for low-cost long-term financing of necessary water production and distribution systems. The County Charter specifically allows the Department of Water Supply to issue its own revenue bonds. Such use should be a subject in the General Plan and turning to these instruments encouraged for planned development of the island yet this county has absolute zero use of this most common of government financial aids. In our flagging economy, such public works projects are a source of employment paid for entirely by homeowners and businesses receiving the new water services. Errors in the document are important. And some illustrate careless research: 1 Those preparing the document need to learn that ARS is Agricultural Research Service and PBARC the Pacific Basin Agricultwal Research Center -not "Resource" as appears several times in the Revision document. This Center is of utmost important in planning, 2. If it is the case that catchment is a public health hazard, that fact needs to be stated in the document and more about it said than merely, "Develop and adopt standards for individual water catchment systems." A study by CTAHR indicates relatively few homes properly maintain the existing catchment systems in place throughout Puna, Ka' u and other areas. If this is the health hazard many believe it to be, we need to know it and act upon it now. If not then standards that are likely unenforceable are not needed. The place findings, not speculation, is in the health section of the General Plan. 3. The loss through liquidation of C. Brewer as a major factor in agriculture should be noted. The Revision refers often to an unchanged C. Brewer. We need discussion on how the vacuum should be filled with community or county coordination of use for the extensive lands that were formerly controlled by a single, privately held entity. This is most notably apparent in the Ka' u section of the economic considerations. 4. The state's ownership of approximately 44 percent of island land should be viewed critically rather than quietly accepted. Not only is the land off the tax roles it is also open to prevention of use by the State Land Use Board as happened in the Oji decision. It now appears likely that what some consider inappropriate state requirements is going to prevent leasing of forest lands at Waiakea Timber Management Area. R®t~ of'these projects were supported by c®una~ ~®verranaere~ Some correction allowing home rule must be reached in the balance of power over the state's massive land holdings. Both federal and state payments "in lieu of taxes" are ridiculously low and will never suffice for the expense the county incurs to serve the unproductive lands. 5. On Page 30 the revision lists as a course of action, "Support the development of a native hardwood industry." The word 'native' should be excised and the emphasis placed on hardwood of any tropical species. This is a necessary change to obtain success in fostering forestry in Hawai' i. 6. Beginning on Page 30 and running over to 31, the very large purchase of both fresh and processed foods by the military on a sustaining basis changes the nature of the 'isolation from overseas markets.' Also UH Hilo's new College of Agriculture, Forestry, Natural Resource Management is a major player among the programs serving the agricultural industry. 3