Laserfiche WebLink
Testimony before the Hawaii County Council on Bill 62 ~ ~~:~«-V <br /> May 20, 1997 /J~ia.Q <br /> Ronald S. Fujiyoshi <br /> <br /> Aloha members of the Hawaii County Council. My name is Ronald Fujiyoshi <br /> <br /> and I am a missionary of the United Church Board for World Ministries <br /> (UCBWM). Part of my assignment as a missionary of the UCBWM I serve as <br /> <br /> the lay pastor of the Ola'a First Hawaiian Church in Kurtistown. The UCBWM <br /> is the missionary arm of the United Church of Christ (UCC). The United <br /> Church of Christ has approximately 1.7 million members throughout the <br /> United States of America, Puerto Rico and Hawaii. In Hawaii the United <br /> Church of Christ is led by the Hawaii Conference United Church of Christ <br /> headquartered in Honolulu. In Hawaii, 122 churches are related to the Hawaii <br /> Conference UCC with a membership of approximately 19,000. On the island <br /> of Hawaii, there are 29 churches ielating to the Hawaii Conference UCC with <br /> a membership of approximately 2,700 members. I do not testify on behalf of <br /> the other members of the United Church of Christ. I just mention the <br /> connection to the United Church of Christ so you can have a clearer picture of <br /> the denominational affiliation and the fellowship to which I am related. <br /> Although our denomination is not one of the largest, it does exert influence. <br /> To give ari example, our church, the United Church of Christ, was mentioned <br /> in Public Law 103-150, the so-called Apology Bill. <br /> I want to testify in opposition to Bill 62, <br /> 1. After listening to testimony at both the Finance Committee and the First <br /> Hearing on this Bill, I am not convinced, and I doubt the majority of the <br /> members of the United Church of Christ a~ew?be~s living on th a Big Island, are <br /> convinced that irradiation of fruit using Cobalt-60 is safe. There are clear <br /> dangers of radiation exposure to humans and to the environment. It seems <br /> clear that irradiation will destroy vitamins and nutrition in fruits. The long-term <br /> consequences of eating irradiated fruits are not known. <br /> 2. It seems tc benefit only a certain segment of our society who are raising <br /> tropical fruits for export. Two Saturdays ago my daughter sold lychees from <br /> our tree at the farmer's market. She sold 48 four pound bags of lychee in one <br /> hour. I heard that lychee in Honolulu was selling for $10 a bag. There is a <br /> market for lychee here in Hawaii and the small farmer has no problem selling <br /> his or her lychee. I also understand that on July 24, 1996, the U.S. <br /> Department of Agriculture proposed to allow lychee from Hawaii to enter the <br /> United States in North America if it is inspected and found free of lychee fruit <br /> moth and then undergoes a hot water treatment for fruit flies." There is no <br /> need for irradiation and irradiation will benefit only the large tropical fruit <br /> growers, mainly the rambutan growers. <br /> 3. Irradiation does not help to make Hawaii more self-sufficient in food. <br /> Spend any money in making the Big Island, which could feed all of Hawai i, <br /> self-sufficient in food. Assist the farmers to grow taro; there is not enough poi <br /> to meet the demand. <br /> 4. Countries like Japan will not buy irradiated fruit and may even stop buying <br /> Cantu. PJo.~ <br /> <br />