My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0493.088 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0493.088 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2019 10:19:43 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:59:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0493
Point
088
Author
Michael J. Matsukawa, Attorney at Law
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC-Close File - 10/08/02
Communications - File Code
PLG
Document Relationships
AGE PC 10/08/2002 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 163 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ed <br />LJ <br />The Honorable Keith W. Ahue <br />Page 2 <br />December 8, 1993 <br />Under these circumstances, we must not allow the residents of the Island of <br />Hawaii to face the risks that would arise from waiting until late 1996 or beyond for <br />power provided by an IPP. HELCO has learned, from the delays encountered by Puna <br />Geothermal Venture, that the best -laid plans can go awry. So far, all of the IPPs with <br />which HELLO has existing firm power purchase contracts have either encountered <br />delays in developing their projects or have had unexpected periods in which they have <br />ceased production. <br />Especially in light of this experience, HELCO believes that it is in the public's <br />best interest, first, to build the 1995 generation unit at Keahole, and, second, to plan <br />for the following generation unit through concurrent planning by HELCO for a utility - <br />constructed addition along with discussions with IPPs proposing units in that time <br />frame. In this way, the public will have better assurances that a reliable source of <br />generation, providing power at a reasonable cost to the consumers, will be available <br />when it is needed. <br />I would like to address the fourth paragraph of your comment letter, which <br />states: <br />"... the statement on page 3-44 that the proposed expansion is consistent with <br />the State's land use classification is misleading. A generator station belongs in <br />the urban district. The existence of the generator station in the Conservation <br />District is a result of unplanned historical circumstances. It would be <br />appropriate to petition the Land Use Commission to remove the parcel from the <br />`Conservation District.' ' <br />HELCO believes that the proposed expansion of the Keahole Generating <br />Station should be permitted in this instance. This conclusion is based, among other <br />things, on the following: <br />HELCO constructed its generating station at Keahole in reliance upon a <br />Conservation District Use Permit issued by the Board of Land and Natural <br />Resources in December 1973. Subsequently, three CDUP amendments were <br />issued by the Land Board in February 1984, February 1987, and September <br />1988. Since 1973, excluding operating costs, HELCO has invested more than <br />$10 million in the Keahole Generating Station in reliance upon the CDUP <br />approval and amendments granted by the Land Board over the last 20 years. <br />We believe it would be unfair and unreasonable to now require HELCO to <br />pursue the State Land Use and County rezoning approvalsefore undertaking <br />the proposed expansion of the Keahole Generating Stat fon. a also believe <br />that this would be very detrimental to HELCO and would prejudice HELCO's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.