My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0042.001 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0042.001 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 2:40:24 PM
Creation date
5/9/2008 11:58:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0042
Point
001
Author
J. Curtis Tyler, III, Vice Chairman, Hawai‘i County Council
Communications - Referred To
PWIRC
Comments
PWIRC: Deferred - 3/18/03
Communications - File Code
HCC/ADV
Document Relationships
AGE PWIRC 03/18/2003 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
BIL 280 Draft 03 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
BIL 280 Draft 03 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
COM 0042.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable J. Curtis Tyler, III <br />Councilman <br />Hawaii County Council <br />Page 4 <br />October 22, 2001 <br />the building. This would allow a very high wall sign on any of the tall buildings in <br />Kailua Village. I would suggest that the maximum height for window and projecting <br />signs be measured from the adjacent sidewalk or walkway, so that a second floor <br />business can have a window or projecting sign. The height limit for a wall sign should be <br />increased—the 1994 Master Plan suggested nine feet; I would suggest fourteen feet or <br />half the height of the building, whichever is less. Half the height of the building is too <br />much when dealing with the taller buildings. <br />No height limit is given in the draft bill for marquee signs in the Village. <br />Under the present code, the Planning Department administers the sign code in Kailua <br />Village; the DPW in the rest of the island. The bill changes that so that DPW also <br />administers the code in the Village, apparently for the sake of consistency. The difficulty <br />is that Kailua village signs will all go to the KVDC for review. DPW personnel do not <br />normally attend KVDC meetings, whereas the Planning Department does, for various <br />other reasons. <br />I suggest that we should be trying to create a consistent sign code along the Kaahumanu <br />Highway from the airport to the Village that discourages the use of signs on individual <br />businesses to attract attention. There is a tremendous amount of light industrial <br />development and commercial development currently being planned along this road <br />corridor. The businesses in the Industrial Subdivision that front the Kaahumanu <br />Highway, and those in the adjacent Liliuokalani Trust lands (which is not even covered <br />by the Kailua sign code) have a much greater visual impact on the visitor and the <br />ordinary motorist than those in the heart of the industrial subdivision. <br />Sincerely, <br />C ISTOPHER J N <br />Planning Director` <br />CJY:pak <br />Wpwin60\Chris\Sign Code Comments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.