Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 02/07/2003 21:59 8089641309 ROY SKOGSTROM PAGE 02 <br /> 2) Brewer has stated that the trash incinerator will produce little pollution (meeting EPA <br /> standards) srul little noise. If this is true, there is no reason that it cau?not be buih where <br /> the trash is, so all this unnecessary nuisance trucking can be avoidod. <br /> 3) Brewer has stated that h wants to build the trash incinerator at t}tc Pepeakeo site <br /> because it has the infreaen,~~ure there (transformers. power lines, etc.). That may be good <br /> for Brewer, but not for the Hilo and Hamakua residents who would have to tolerate all <br /> those noisy, smelly trucks every 10 minutes for the next twenty years. Tourism would be <br /> negatively impacted as well. <br /> As for costs, 32 round trip trucks per day, 365 days a year, for 20 years, at SI50 per <br /> round trip, equals S3S million worth of unnecessary truckirte eraugh to buy a whole bt <br /> of transformers and power lines to build the plant where the trash is. <br /> Let's not waste tax dollars, create unnecessary noise a~ air pollution, negatively impact <br /> tourism, and stick heavy industry in the middle of prime tesidernial/agricultural land. <br /> Please decry the proposed incrcasod area for heavy industry at Pepeekeo Poiut, and build <br /> the trash plain where the trash is. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> C.~~ <br /> Roy K. Skogstrom <br /> 2 <br /> <br />