COM 0314.006 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

consequences. But we will have to apply owselves with a resolve marked by continuing education for ow citizens, the determination to resist politicians who traffic in drug hysteria while committing all manner of un-righteous acts, personally taking junkets, and lobbyist moneys, while they chop up and destroy the precious protections granted by the bill of rights., and the patience and compassion to treat individuals caught in the grip of illegal drugs. The metaphor of a "war on drugs" is misleading. Wars are expected to end. Addressing drug prohibition is a continuous challenge; the moment we believe ourselves to be victorious and free to relax ow resolve, tyranny will rise again. Furthermore, the United States should not wage war on its citizens, many of whom are the victims of this Drug War. These individuals must be helped, not defeated. It is the deniers of civil rights, both foreign and domestic, who must be thwarted. A more appropriate analogy for The War on Same People Who Use Certain Dmgs is cancer. Dealing with cancer is a long-term proposition. Decreasing The War on Some People Who Use Certain Drugs in America is a difficult task.. The duty of the federal govemment is to help communities overcome the consequences of the war on some dings. Ultimately, each American must make his or her own decision about whether stop The Waz on Some People Who Use Certain Drugs or not because it will take American resolve to restore what an bloated and out of control drug war bweaucracy has done to ow basic freedoms. When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I don't deal drugs. When they took [he six amendment, I was quiet because I'm innocent. When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun. Now theybe taken the first amendment and I can't say anything at all. the above is a setting right of the Governments rhetoric found at http: //www. ncj rs. org/htm/chapter l . h[m#overview