Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL <br />Page 6 <br />December 18, 2003 <br />building permit it the classic example of a ministerial permit. If a property already has <br />the proper zoning, the Planning Director to deny a building permit solely based upon the <br />General Plan, because unlike rezonings and SMA permits, the laws do not give the <br />Director or any other official the power to invoke the General Plan at that late stage. For <br />example, if a property is zoned "Residential", but happens to be "Open" in the General <br />Plan, the County is not empowered to deny the building permit based solely upon the <br />General Plan. The General Plan is not applied at that stage; it is primarily to be applied at <br />the stage of rezoning, SMA permits, use permits, and other discretionary approvals. <br />At p. 9-10 of the letter, there is reference to landowners having vested rights to <br />proceed with construction of additional dwellings. It is not clear to me what this is <br />referring to. None of the proposed land use changes in the General Plan affect rights that <br />have already been created by final subdivision approvals. As described in the previous <br />paragraph, if a landowner has an automatic right to a building permit based upon zoning, <br />the General Plan designation can't change that. <br />4. The letter contains criticism of a proposal in the draft General Plan that the <br />zoning code be amended to include a new "Conservation" zone, which would cover land <br />that should be kept in a largely natural state, but that "may not be in the Conservation <br />District." This proposal is not meant to assert jurisdiction over lands in the state land use <br />conservation district, as the text of the proposed amendment clearly states. Those lands <br />are under the jurisdiction of the BLNR (except the county has some jurisdiction when <br />they are also in the SMA.) The point of this proposed zoning district is that there are <br />lands outside of the conservation district that should be kept in a largely natural state, <br />such as some gulches, areas with very steep slopes, and historical sites, but no zoning <br />district that really accomplishes that. The "Open" zoning district can allow considerable <br />ground alteration. The City and County of Honolulu has the equivalent of this <br />"Conservation" zone in its "Preservation" zones. Creating a "Conservation" zoning <br />district will not in itself be a taking. Applying it to a particular piece of property may be a <br />taking under the analysis described above, if it results in the loss of all economic benefit <br />from the entire parcel, but this is an analysis that has to be made on a case-by-case basis <br />whenever property would be rezoned to Conservation. <br />5. Pages 0-13 of the letter argues that the provision in the General Plan requiring <br />public access of coastal development is unconstitutional. This provision being criticized <br />is in the existing (1989) General Plan. Various state laws (H.R.S. sec. 46-6.5, H.R.S. sec. <br />205A -26(1)(A) and Chap. 34 of the Hawaii County Code require public access for <br />