Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Honorable Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 2 <br /> December 15, 2003 <br /> changes. The Council should allow at least four months for the Planning Director and <br /> Commission to finish their review of any Council-initiated amendments, because the <br /> Planning Commission will have to hold hearings before taking a vote on them. <br /> It will take a concentrated effort by the Council to adopt a revised General Plan before <br /> the end of the current council terms. If it is not done by December 2004, there will be at <br /> least some new councilmembers who will have to become familiar with the revisions <br /> (based on announcements that have already been made by members that they will not <br /> run), and we will possibly have a different administration. <br /> The importance of a timely comprehensive revision to the General Plan cannot be <br /> overstated. According to the County Charter, "no public improvement or project, or <br /> subdivision or zoning ordinance, shall be initiated or adopted unless the same conforms <br /> to and implements the general plan." Sec. 3-15(b). Under state law, all zoning must be <br /> done within the framework of along-range, comprehensive general plan. Without a <br /> comprehensive general plan, specific zoning decisions can be attacked legally as arbitrary <br /> and capricious. <br /> Much has changed since the 1989 General Plan. That plan was based on population <br /> projects for 2000 that ranged from 155,000 (Series A) to 212,000 (Series C). The actual <br /> population was 148,000. The 1989 Plan projected westbound visitor amvals in 2000 to <br /> range from 1,485,000 (Series A) to 1,664,000 (Series C). The actual figure was 925,000. <br /> The largest agricultural employer, sugar, has disappeared. A comprehensive revision to <br /> the General Plan is overdue. <br /> "Housekeeping" Issues <br /> With a project of this magnitude, it can be difficult to keep track of all of the paper that <br /> comes in. To assist the council, this portion of the letter discusses some of the key <br /> documents. <br /> The councilmembers have two bound volumes of the revised General Plan. The volume <br /> bound in green, entitled "County of Hawaii General Plan Revision December 21, 2001 <br /> Draft" contains the Ramseyered version of the current General Plan with revisions <br /> proposed by the Planning Director. New additions to the General Plan are show in bold, <br /> deletions are shown by [brackets]. The thinner volume, bound in pink, entitled "County <br /> of Hawaii General Plan Revision December 21, 2001 Draft Appendix A" contains the <br /> <br />