My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0045.025 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0045.025 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2019 2:09:59 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:29:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0045
Point
025
Author
Christopher J. Yuen, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC - Closed file - 1/4/05 Presented: PC - 12/18/03
Document Relationships
AGE PC 01/04/2005 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 163 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0045.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Honorable Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 2 <br /> December 15, 2003 <br /> changes. The Council should allow at least four months for the Planning Director and <br /> Commission to finish their review of any Council-initiated amendments, because the <br /> Planning Commission will have to hold hearings before taking a vote on them. <br /> It will take a concentrated effort by the Council to adopt a revised General Plan before <br /> the end of the current council terms. If it is not done by December 2004, there will be at <br /> least some new councilmembers who will have to become familiar with the revisions <br /> (based on announcements that have already been made by members that they will not <br /> run), and we will possibly have a different administration. <br /> The importance of a timely comprehensive revision to the General Plan cannot be <br /> overstated. According to the County Charter, "no public improvement or project, or <br /> subdivision or zoning ordinance, shall be initiated or adopted unless the same conforms <br /> to and implements the general plan." Sec. 3-15(b). Under state law, all zoning must be <br /> done within the framework of along-range, comprehensive general plan. Without a <br /> comprehensive general plan, specific zoning decisions can be attacked legally as arbitrary <br /> and capricious. <br /> Much has changed since the 1989 General Plan. That plan was based on population <br /> projects for 2000 that ranged from 155,000 (Series A) to 212,000 (Series C). The actual <br /> population was 148,000. The 1989 Plan projected westbound visitor amvals in 2000 to <br /> range from 1,485,000 (Series A) to 1,664,000 (Series C). The actual figure was 925,000. <br /> The largest agricultural employer, sugar, has disappeared. A comprehensive revision to <br /> the General Plan is overdue. <br /> "Housekeeping" Issues <br /> With a project of this magnitude, it can be difficult to keep track of all of the paper that <br /> comes in. To assist the council, this portion of the letter discusses some of the key <br /> documents. <br /> The councilmembers have two bound volumes of the revised General Plan. The volume <br /> bound in green, entitled "County of Hawaii General Plan Revision December 21, 2001 <br /> Draft" contains the Ramseyered version of the current General Plan with revisions <br /> proposed by the Planning Director. New additions to the General Plan are show in bold, <br /> deletions are shown by [brackets]. The thinner volume, bound in pink, entitled "County <br /> of Hawaii General Plan Revision December 21, 2001 Draft Appendix A" contains the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.